Re: avoiding jbcl?

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Article #11654

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing Previous Next

#11654

From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00

16 lines
1130 bytes

Richard Wilkman <rwilkman@inprise.com> writes:

> Ah well.  It is such a bad thing that it has been incorporated into
> Java 2 and will probably be back ported to JDK 1.1x in the future.

Yes. One might wonder what they were thinking:

"For 1.1, let us make this nice Bean model, with property editors
giving a Java initialization string they can put into setFoo() methods
in generated source-code. For that reason, let us make all-property-
setting constructors for all helper classes in the AWT, _except_ for
GridBagConstraints - for reasons only known to Bob."

"Yeah, let's."

:-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <uogkqqr0f.fsf@sds.no>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7es8v5$ar04@forums.borland.com> <MPG.117e8cb0812f5fe1989b75@forums.inprise.com> <37150ADA.27E1790F@inprise.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,adb18793a260417f
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no>
Subject: Re: avoiding jbcl?
Date: 1999/04/15
Message-ID: <uogkqqr0f.fsf@sds.no>
X-Deja-AN: 466625767
Sender: towi@SDSA1761
References: <7es8v5$ar04@forums.borland.com> <MPG.117e8cb0812f5fe1989b75@forums.inprise.com> <37150ADA.27E1790F@inprise.com>
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Reply to Parent Message