Re: avoiding jbcl?

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Article #11680

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing Previous Next

#11680

From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:00

9 lines
1047 bytes

"Michael A. Long" <mlong@ecst.csuchico.edu> writes:

> Inner classes: The poor mans obfuscator.

Well, they don't do very much more than to "shorten" some helper
classes that you otherwise would have placed in a package scope. I
find them useful, since their advantage over other helper classes - in
addition to the syntactic sugar coating - is that you can limit
visibility in a better way (they can be made protected).

Technical Details

Message-ID: <upv51nfo4.fsf@sds.no>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<7es8v5$ar04@forums.borland.com> <MPG.117e8cb0812f5fe1989b75@forums.inprise.com> <37150ADA.27E1790F@inprise.com> <uogkqqr0f.fsf@sds.no> <371605CD.6CD470FB@inprise.com> <7fas7j$oe93@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,adb18793a260417f
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no>
Subject: Re: avoiding jbcl?
Date: 1999/04/19
Message-ID: <upv51nfo4.fsf@sds.no>
X-Deja-AN: 468226082
Sender: towi@SDSA1761
References: <7es8v5$ar04@forums.borland.com> <MPG.117e8cb0812f5fe1989b75@forums.inprise.com> <37150ADA.27E1790F@inprise.com> <uogkqqr0f.fsf@sds.no> <371605CD.6CD470FB@inprise.com> <7fas7j$oe93@forums.borland.com>
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Reply to Parent Message