Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #11942Re: IconImage, Image, Frame & Transparency
From: Chris Hill
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00
22 lines
1320 bytes
1320 bytes
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999 08:12:27 -0800, Richard Wilkman <rwilkman@inprise.com> wrote: >Derek: > >Well, folks only get three votes on the Bug Parade. Personally if I >had to choose between a core Java bug and a cosmetic bug on the Wintel >platform, I'd chose the former <g>. > >-Rich I'd guess that Javasoft would automatically fix core bugs before cosmetic issues, but actually they seem to take forever to fix bugs of all kinds. That is why I vote for "serious" cosmetic bugs. I depend on the people at Javasoft to ignore the will of the people if there is an important core bug. Perhaps I should rethink my strategy. <g> Is there evidence to support the threory that bugs that are high on the list get addressed? Chris Hill Chris244@aol.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36eff3bc.147177900@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7c51fm$i2d10@forums.borland.com> <36E694C4.626945A0@inprise.com> <7cnbqt$5jc7@forums.borland.com> <36EFD46B.E853A977@inprise.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d45,790af0b3b95d8a01 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public From: Chris244@aol.com (Chris Hill) Subject: Re: IconImage, Image, Frame & Transparency Date: 1999/03/17 Message-ID: <36eff3bc.147177900@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 455875639 References: <7c51fm$i2d10@forums.borland.com> <36E694C4.626945A0@inprise.com> <7cnbqt$5jc7@forums.borland.com> <36EFD46B.E853A977@inprise.com> Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing