Re: Cafe 3.0 vs. JBuilder 2.x

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Article #12122

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing Previous Next

#12122

From: JamesN
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00

45 lines
1574 bytes

#1 is a biggy in my opinion since it breaks the
idea of pure Swing GUI.  I was very disappointed
when I first noticed this on using JBuilder 2.  I
felt like shipping the thing back to Borland ;
probably should have.

1. No wrapper classes are generated; ie
GridBagLayout2.
I don't want to have to ship Borland classes with
my code.

2. GridBagLayout
You can layout the components positionally and
then change the layout to GridBagLayout and it
generates appropriate.

more points to follow...

Have you checked out Netbeans product or
SwingBuilder from SwingSoft.  Take these for a
test drive and you'll see how far JBuilder is
behind !

/James

Richard Ulrich wrote in message
<01be592e$b649cc50$d6c7afce@uai-4>...
|James,
|
|Could you please elaborate on the "better GUI
builder hands down" point?
|
|Thanks,
|Richard Ulrich
|
|
|JamesN <james@bconnex.net> wrote in article
|<7aa3kj$56j18@forums.borland.com>...
|>
|> I'm on the edge of buying Cafe 3.0  ,,,
|
|> 5. Better GUI builder hands down.
|>
|

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7aa6gt$55l26@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7aa3kj$56j18@forums.borland.com> <01be592e$b649cc50$d6c7afce@uai-4>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,193609854064a816
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: "JamesN" <james@bconnex.net>
Subject: Re: Cafe 3.0 vs. JBuilder 2.x
Date: 1999/02/15
Message-ID: <7aa6gt$55l26@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 444726947
References: <7aa3kj$56j18@forums.borland.com> <01be592e$b649cc50$d6c7afce@uai-4>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Reply to Parent Message