🚀 go-pugleaf

So off the bat does this rule out using 1.1.6_Borland with JFC 1.1???  (Minor
bugs aside)  I guess I'll probably find out before you reply.  It would be nice
to know what you think though<g>.

--Nikolaos


Richard Wilkman wrote:

> Kreg:
>
> In my copy of the *shipping* JFC 1.1 it says it needs fixes in 1.1.5
> or greater and does assume (where it's doing all the settings) 1.1.7
> is what you have.
>
> The reality is that a lot of fixes that JFC 1.1 needs live in JDK
> 1.1.7.  Now, if you don't hit those bugs, great!  You'll want to be
> real familiar with searching on the Bug Parade at JDC, though.
>
> -Rich
>
> Kreg Holgerson wrote:
> >
> > In the instructions for the JBuilder update for JFC 1.1 (javax), the
> > following is stated:  "The documentation for JFC 1.1 indicates that it only
> > works with JDK 1.1.7 or greater."
> >
> > However, when I look at the Swing 1.1 readme.txt file I find: "This Swing
> > release relies on bug fixes first released in JDK 1.1.5."
> >
> > Does anyone know which are the correct JDKs that can be used with the new
> > JBLC-X and Swing 1.1 components?
>
> --
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Rich Wilkman
> Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
> Borland JBuilder Team
>
> If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
> it's mine and mine alone.
>
> Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
> be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
> a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=