🚀 go-pugleaf

Vladimir:

If you look at jdbTable you'll see that it simply extends JTable and
adds hooks to our dataset stuff.  This gives you all that JTable does
plus all the data aware stuff that JFC just doesn't hack.

-Rich

Vladimir Olenin wrote:
> 
> Steve, i got u really wrong. I thought u asked about JTable. As to
> jdbTable, can't advise u anything, since i never used it. Actually if i
> were u, i would rather use JTable, since it's more universal (count in
> the fact that JFC will be a part of JDK 2.x) and easier to use (to
> compare with Borland components (JBCL), JFC is more standardized and has
> much more variety of components with similar rules of use). I can say
> that to compare with KL-Group and Borland components, JFC is the best.
> Have a nice day!
> 
>                                          Vladimir
> 
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>                                           <keenonjava@collegemail.com>
>   version:2.1
>   Java programmer. Open for project development offers. See my home page at: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/9815/
>   Additional Information:
>   Last Name    Vladimir
>   First Name   Olenin
>   Version      2.1

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rich Wilkman
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
Borland JBuilder Team

If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
it's mine and mine alone.

Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=