Re: Swing 1.0.1 vs. 1.0.3

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Article #13159

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing Previous Next

#13159

From: Tad Frysinger
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00

16 lines
964 bytes

In article <6tinot$nqv6@forums.borland.com>, Frode.Oldervoll@cmr.no 
says...
> The swingall.jar (1.0.1) installed with my JBuilder 2 Professional is 5390
> KB, and I have downloaded a copy of 1.0.3 which is 1957 KB. Can anyone
> explain this HUGE difference?
> 
> -Frode Oldervoll
> Scientist at Christian Michelsen Research AS, Bergen, Norway
> 
> 
> 
The one that comes with JBuilder has the dependencies built into it to 
make for faster compiles under JBuilder.  The 1.0.3 one doesn't.

Tad Frysinger
[TeamB]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MPG.106769735b9ac8719898e0@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6tinot$nqv6@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,ef5c8f6a258c1df3
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: tfrysinger@uswest.net (Tad Frysinger)
Subject: Re: Swing 1.0.1 vs. 1.0.3
Date: 1998/09/14
Message-ID: <MPG.106769735b9ac8719898e0@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 391186836
References: <6tinot$nqv6@forums.borland.com>
Organization: FreeZone Enterprises
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Reply to Parent Message