🚀 go-pugleaf

Well, I did not have luck with JFC 1.1beta.

I replaced swingall.jar with the new one from JFC 1.1.

I got a few warning messages, that is fine. But, when
the applet starts, it first gives a warning:

Swing: checked access to system event queue.

Then, the applet throws a NullPointerException when
it executes Init() --> GridControl Init().

If I apply the old version of swingall.jar, everything
is fine.


Anyway, could you tell me how to make JFC classes a library ?
I have no clue of doing it. That might help.

Thanks.

				Yan



Richard Wilkman wrote:
> 
> Yan:
> 
> When you get a new JFC drop you can make a library for it and drag
> that libray to the top of the list.  Creating the library will make
> the dependencies.
> 
> If you don't do it via a library you'll get some compiler warnings
> about assuming that the package is stable -- no big deal there.
> 
> -Rich
> 
> yan zhou wrote:
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >  So, should I replace the swingall.jar in \lib with the new one
> > or just leave it there regardless of JFC version ?
> >
> >  If I need to replace it, how should I handle these dependency
> > files maintained by Inprise ?
> >
> >  Thanks.
> >                         Yan
> >
> > Richard Wilkman wrote:
> > >
> > > Yan:
> > >
> > > The one in \lib is the same as the one in \redist *except* that we
> > > added the dependency files to it to help the compiler.  \redist is the
> > > directory which contains the stuff you are allowed to deploy when you
> > > want to use the whole jar, etc.
> > >
> > > BTW, it's really a good education to just open up JAR files and look
> > > at them.  I use WinZip for it, myself.
> > >
> > > -Rich
> > >
> > > yan zhou wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I checked comp.lang.* and did a search via dejanews.com.
> > > > There are a few threads complaining
> > > > about the slowness, but I did not see any suggestions or
> > > > solutions.
> > > >
> > > >   Personally speaking, I would attribute this to the architecture
> > > > of Sun system and the JVM of browsers on Unix.
> > > >
> > > >  As a trial, I downloaded JFC 1.03. I noticed there is swingall.jar
> > > > under JBuilder/lib which is about 5M, and in JBuilder/redist
> > > > the swingall.jar is only 1.8M. What is the difference between
> > > > these two files ? I think JB is using the former.
> > > >
> > > >   Should I replace all original swing*.jar with the ones
> > > > come from JFC 1.03, so that JBuilder adopts JFC 1.03 ?
> > > >
> > > >   Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >                         Yan
> > > >
> > > > Richard Wilkman wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yan:
> > > > >
> > > > > There were some threads on this in the regular comp.lang groups.  Some
> > > > > saw much improvement by moving to JFC 1.02 or 1.03.  Of course, they
> > > > > also saw the new bugs in those releases and had to choose.  Some
> > > > > threads indicated that doublebuffering seemed to make things worse.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rich
> > > > >
> > > > > yan zhou wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     Did anybody experience very slow response
> > > > > > for Swing applets on Solaris boxes ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     Mine is OK on windows, but so slow on
> > > > > > Solaris. Each time I hit keyboard,
> > > > > > I have to wait for two seconds for characters
> > > > > > showing up in JTextField or JTextArea. Besides
> > > > > > that, the overall response is slow on Solaris,
> > > > > > too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     Is there any work around or explanation
> > > > > > regarding this ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     Thanks in advance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                                 Yan Zhou
> > > > > >                                 yzhou@mtu.edu
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > > > > Rich Wilkman
> > > > > Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
> > > > > Borland JBuilder Team
> > > > >
> > > > > If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
> > > > > it's mine and mine alone.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
> > > > > be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
> > > > > a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
> > > > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > > Rich Wilkman
> > > Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
> > > Borland JBuilder Team
> > >
> > > If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
> > > it's mine and mine alone.
> > >
> > > Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
> > > be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
> > > a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
> > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> --
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Rich Wilkman
> Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
> Borland JBuilder Team
> 
> If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
> it's mine and mine alone.
> 
> Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
> be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
> a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=