Re: JFrame and JDialog (Very Difficult Question)

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Article #8327

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing Previous Next

#8327

From: Daniel Hägg
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:00

15 lines
1183 bytes

X_Aki Nieminen_X wrote:

> I have a project, where we convert old native MDI application to Java. I
> made a decision, that it is more feasible not to use MDI application.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts about MDI applications.
I found it very interesting and useful.
I am currently developing a MDI application using the JInternalFrame approach.
But I am not very happy about the results so far. There seem to be lots of
little
swing bugs regarding JInternalFrame (even in java 1.3).
Your posting made me think more seriously about changing to multiple JFrames.

 /
/ Daniel

Technical Details

Message-ID: <39C87E1C.2BE84327@factel.se>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <39BD8DC4.15B1257E@net.polyu.edu.hk> <39bf981a$1_2@dnews>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,bf46e48d4e441390
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: Daniel Hägg <daniel.hagg@factel.se>
Subject: Re: JFrame and JDialog (Very Difficult Question)
Date: 2000/09/20
Message-ID: <39C87E1C.2BE84327@factel.se>
X-Deja-AN: 671962322
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <39BD8DC4.15B1257E@net.polyu.edu.hk> <39bf981a$1_2@dnews>
X-Accept-Language: sv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Factum
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Reply to Parent Message