🚀 go-pugleaf

"Lori M Olson (TeamB)" <javadragon@techie.com> wrote:
>Avi wrote:
>
>> I would like to know how many people are using this library.
>
>It has been very popular in the past, and remains reasonably
>popular as a toolset to enhance Java Swing applications.
>
>http://www.sys-con.com/2002/PR/02252004.cfm
>
>It's the most mature of the available tools, so I don't think
>you'll have too many problems with it.

Lori,
Thank you very much for your response.

We already are using it -- and we are having *lots* of problems
with it. We are mainly using the "livetable"

http://www.quest.com/jclass/livetable.asp

the "elements"

http://www.quest.com/jclass/elements.asp

and the "field"

http://www.quest.com/jclass/field.asp

According to the data on those Web pages, they haven't been
updated for nearly one year! And the "field" Web page shows a
screen shot that proudly boasts

"currently no equivalent in JDK 1.2"

Could it be that the people who vited it as the best java
library (in the "JDJ" awards) are using other parts of "JClass"
(and not the parts that we are using) ?

Thanks,
Avi.