Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.linux
Article #4922Re: Help please!
From: John Hinsley
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 00:00
84 lines
3646 bytes
3646 bytes
tluyben wrote: > > John Hinsley wrote: > > > I really can't get the hang of installing Java/running Java on Linux. > > > > I'm trying to run anyj on SuSE 6.1 (OK, so they've tested it on 6.2, but > > there > > really isn't that much difference). > > > > > I've installed the anj stuff, the IBM jdk118 and jre118 to one > > directory: > > /opt/anyj so it looks like this: > > > > Do NOT install IBM jre with anyj. The jdk117 at blackdown works fine... > The ibmpackage is highly unstable as far as I can see, especially with > AWT / Swing. > jdk117_3 is quite stable, especially for servlets; it hasn't crashed on > me yet. > On the client I have not seen any stable java; the linux versions are > the worst, but under windows, java apps (jbuilder also) keep crashing > all the time. Under NT and 95/98 with different kinds of JVM. > A company like Borland should concentrate a division of programmers > on the sole task of make the AWT bugless and lightning fast; that WILL > get you loads of publicity. Just the thing Borland needs... > I'm not sure if Sun is doing something about it, but I would take WxWindows > (crossplatform toolkit) or something and route all calls to AWT or Swing > directly to WxWindows. That and a good JIT will get you there and it > will get you there almost bugless (the WxWindows toolkit is well tested, > all AWT native stuff is not) > > My 2 cents... > > Best regards, > Tycho Luyben > > C with OO is like a pig with wings. Thanks Tycho Hmmm. I'm not sure . There are people out there who have anyj working without much hastle with the IBM bits and bobs and who recon it's pretty quick. I think I'm falling foul of an installation (and initiation) technique which seems to have been written for grey haired Unix sysops with 30 years of experience. (As I say, I can't get the Borland stuff working -- with the blackdown kit -- but then, I'm not exactly sure what I should expect: I expected a nice IDE to pop up, as it does for just about any Smalltalk I install). While you might be able to get away with that on Unix or Free BSD, I don't think you can with Linux anymore. I just want a nice IDE to help me learn the language, I don't care if it crashes every so often. But I'm not sure that pure (ie. without Python) java warrants the effort of a CLI: everyone seems to be abandoning it for "serious" applications. And I can't see anything coming from Sun: as a company, they depress me even more than Microsoft. (But for different reasons). Never before has so much talent been headed up by such morons! They've stopped work on Scheme and delivered an unimproved version of Star Office to a bewhildered universe through so little bandwidth that it would take 20 hours to download it and, what's more, through HTTP, so the connection will remain broken. Morons!!! Sorry -- Turning C into an object oriented language is like trying to make a dog into an octopus.............. by nailing extra legs on it. (found on a Smalltalk site.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<38408E09.FB4BFF6B@telinco.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<38402A44.EA959E9A@telinco.co.uk> <384032C8.DBAED893@a-net.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107590,a5ff5ddd3703ee88 X-Google-Attributes: gid107590,public From: John Hinsley <jhinsley@telinco.co.uk> Subject: Re: Help please! Date: 1999/11/28 Message-ID: <38408E09.FB4BFF6B@telinco.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 553922965 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38402A44.EA959E9A@telinco.co.uk> <384032C8.DBAED893@a-net.nl> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.linux