🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: borland.public.jdatastore
5 messages
5 total messages Started by Mehmet Erten Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:45
JDataStore and JBuilder 2006 works good (good news)
#192
Author: Mehmet Erten
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:45
12 lines
1504 bytes
I downloaded and start testing JBuilder 2006.
After a few minutes, looks like JBuilder 2006 works with JDK 1.5 and with 
JDataStore without any problem.
JDataStore array index problem with JBuilder 2005 is gone with JBuilder 
2006.
Good Job.

But JdbComboBox works still the same way. Array keys positions to the value 
but enter key do not select it with an enter key.
If a key entered, it goes to the the first matching value with this letter 
but even after with the array up/down keys the focus is moved onto another 
drop down value "enter" key brings the first positioned value.
Re: JDataStore and JBuilder 2006 works good (good news)
#193
Author: Knopfler
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:34
19 lines
1711 bytes
What about the data-express and dbswing part ? Any improvments or 
updates that you have seen ?


Mehmet Erten wrote:
> I downloaded and start testing JBuilder 2006.
> After a few minutes, looks like JBuilder 2006 works with JDK 1.5 and with 
> JDataStore without any problem.
> JDataStore array index problem with JBuilder 2005 is gone with JBuilder 
> 2006.
> Good Job.
> 
> But JdbComboBox works still the same way. Array keys positions to the value 
> but enter key do not select it with an enter key.
> If a key entered, it goes to the the first matching value with this letter 
> but even after with the array up/down keys the focus is moved onto another 
> drop down value "enter" key brings the first positioned value.
> 
> 
Re: JDataStore and JBuilder 2006 works good (good news)
#194
Author: Mehmet Erten
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:58
8 lines
1368 bytes
I saw (first glance) "edited text" (dbswing) field.
So it should be a lot more good stuffs there.

I can work with Design Page with JDataStore in JBuilder X on this notebook
(512MB memory). But it looks like it is not any more possible with JB 2005
or JB 2006.
I had problem with JB 2005 on Desktop even with 2 gig memory. I will test
2006 on it this weekend.
Re: JDataStore and JBuilder 2006 works good (good news)
#195
Author: Lori M Olson [TeamB]
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:15
39 lines
2301 bytes
Mehmet Erten wrote:
> I saw (first glance) "edited text" (dbswing) field.
> So it should be a lot more good stuffs there.
> 
> I can work with Design Page with JDataStore in JBuilder X on this notebook
> (512MB memory). But it looks like it is not any more possible with JB 2005
> or JB 2006.
> I had problem with JB 2005 on Desktop even with 2 gig memory. I will test
> 2006 on it this weekend.
> 
> 

I have run JB2005 Foundation on a Linux notebook with 256 MB of memory. 
  It was slow, but usable.

I also run JB2005/2006 on a Windows desktop and Mac Powerbook, each of 
which has only 1 GB of memory, and they run *just fine*.

So if you are running into problems with 2 GB, you have some issue that 
is not necessarily related to JBuilder.

-- 

Regards,

Lori Olson [TeamB]

------------

Save yourself, and everyone else, some time and search the
newsgroups and the FAQ-O-Matic before posting your next
question.

Google Advanced Newsgroup Search
     http://www.google.ca/advanced_group_search
Other Newsgroup Searches:
     http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/ngsearch.html
Joi Ellis's FAQ-O-Matic:
     http://www.visi.com/~gyles19/fom-serve/cache/1.html
Re: JDataStore and JBuilder 2006 works good (good news)
#196
Author: Mehmet Erten
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:59
63 lines
3400 bytes
Hi Lori,
All I do is to compare JBuilder versions and sometime use a different 
version for a different purpose until the issue is gone.

Remember I wrote about JBuilderX, JBuilder2005 and JBuilder2006.
I did not use JBuilder2005 at all with the array index error for JDataStore 
empty row work files.
But JBuilder2006 is perfectly fine with it.

Now let me make it clear: on the same notebook (512MB) JBuilderX works like 
a charm in design mode with JDataStore tables and swing objects.
But JBuilderX and JBuilder2006 with the same everything hangs up for a long 
time if than shows the design object, it does show a very different GUI 
design than JBuilderX.

Until I see it will function better, most likely I design in JBuilderX and 
run and compile with JBuilder2006.
Since it does not have any JDK 1.5 issue.
Of course the limitation of this, not able to use the new features.

"Lori M Olson [TeamB]" <javadragon@techie.com> wrote in message 
news:432afd4a@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Mehmet Erten wrote:
>> I saw (first glance) "edited text" (dbswing) field.
>> So it should be a lot more good stuffs there.
>>
>> I can work with Design Page with JDataStore in JBuilder X on this 
>> notebook
>> (512MB memory). But it looks like it is not any more possible with JB 
>> 2005
>> or JB 2006.
>> I had problem with JB 2005 on Desktop even with 2 gig memory. I will test
>> 2006 on it this weekend.
>>
>>
>
> I have run JB2005 Foundation on a Linux notebook with 256 MB of memory. It 
> was slow, but usable.
>
> I also run JB2005/2006 on a Windows desktop and Mac Powerbook, each of 
> which has only 1 GB of memory, and they run *just fine*.
>
> So if you are running into problems with 2 GB, you have some issue that is 
> not necessarily related to JBuilder.
>
> -- 
>
> Regards,
>
> Lori Olson [TeamB]
>
> ------------
>
> Save yourself, and everyone else, some time and search the
> newsgroups and the FAQ-O-Matic before posting your next
> question.
>
> Google Advanced Newsgroup Search
>     http://www.google.ca/advanced_group_search
> Other Newsgroup Searches:
>     http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/ngsearch.html
> Joi Ellis's FAQ-O-Matic:
>     http://www.visi.com/~gyles19/fom-serve/cache/1.html 
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads