🚀 go-pugleaf

Please submit this to quality central.

John T. Dow wrote:
> The following query misbehaves.
> 
> SELECT * FROM MYTABLE WHERE ID IN 
> ('004366','063580','004982','054290','007162','011324');
> 
> It only returns 5 of the 6 rows. Row 063580 is missing. If I change the 
> query to use ID = 'XXX' OR ID = 'XXX' etc it still fails. Changing the 
> order of the values being tested makes no difference. Selecting row 063580 
> by itseld works.
> 
> This is with server version 007.004.011.000.
> 
> I also have server version, for which I purchased a license. It behaves 
> properly, finding all 6 rows.
> 
> I tried to post this to quality central I always have problems with that. 
> When prompted, I downloaded the latest windows client and it had numerous 
> errors, in addition to saying that the server wasn't running and did I want 
> to run offline.

I will try again. As I said in my original posting, I've not had much luck 
posting to qc. I tried again today. See my comments below, last paragraph.



Quinn Wildman <qwildman@borland.com> wrote in
news:43fcfaa5$1@newsgroups.borland.com: 

> Please submit this to quality central.
> 
> John T. Dow wrote:
>> The following query misbehaves.
>> 
>> SELECT * FROM MYTABLE WHERE ID IN 
>> ('004366','063580','004982','054290','007162','011324');
>> 
>> It only returns 5 of the 6 rows. Row 063580 is missing. If I change
>> the query to use ID = 'XXX' OR ID = 'XXX' etc it still fails.
>> Changing the order of the values being tested makes no difference.
>> Selecting row 063580 by itseld works.
>> 
>> This is with server version 007.004.011.000.
>> 
>> I also have server version, for which I purchased a license. It
>> behaves properly, finding all 6 rows.
>> 
>> I tried to post this to quality central I always have problems with
>> that. When prompted, I downloaded the latest windows client and it
>> had numerous errors, in addition to saying that the server wasn't
>> running and did I want to run offline.
> 

John T. Dow wrote:
> I will try again. As I said in my original posting, I've not had much luck 
> posting to qc. I tried again today. See my comments below, last paragraph.
> 

There are 3 ways to use QC.

1.  From within JBuilder
2.  Download and use the QC Windows client
3.  Download and use the QC Java client
3.  Use the web QC (http://qc.borland.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?ar=3770)

Surely one of those will work for you?

-- 

Regards,

Lori Olson [TeamB]

------------

Save yourself, and everyone else, some time and search the
newsgroups and the FAQ-O-Matic before posting your next
question.

Google Advanced Newsgroup Search
     http://www.google.ca/advanced_group_search
Other Newsgroup Searches:
     http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/ngsearch.html
Joi Ellis's FAQ-O-Matic:
     http://www.visi.com/~gyles19/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Lori M Olson [TeamB] wrote:
> John T. Dow wrote:
>> I will try again. As I said in my original posting, I've not had much 
>> luck posting to qc. I tried again today. See my comments below, last 
>> paragraph.
>>
> 
> There are 3 ways to use QC.
> 
> 1.  From within JBuilder
> 2.  Download and use the QC Windows client
> 3.  Download and use the QC Java client
> 3.  Use the web QC (http://qc.borland.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?ar=3770)
> 
> Surely one of those will work for you?
> 

Ok, I meant 4 ways :-p

-- 

Regards,

Lori Olson [TeamB]

I was able to post it to qc, using the windows client. I had a hard time 
with it, it kept aborting, but google told me that if the userid or 
password is wrong it will abort. So I looked there and was successful. 

I could not get the java client to work, either standalone or in jbuilder, 
and I could not figure out how to post using the web client.

But it is now posted as 25328. I made a similar mistake in not being able 
to count and amended my posting with a comment. Also, you can't post a 
report for JDataStore7, so I commented that also.


"Lori M Olson [TeamB]" <javadragon@techie.com> wrote in 
news:43fdeb7f@newsgroups.borland.com:

> Lori M Olson [TeamB] wrote:
>> John T. Dow wrote:
>>> I will try again. As I said in my original posting, I've not had much 
>>> luck posting to qc. I tried again today. See my comments below, last 
>>> paragraph.
>>>
>> 
>> There are 3 ways to use QC.
>> 
>> 1.  From within JBuilder
>> 2.  Download and use the QC Windows client
>> 3.  Download and use the QC Java client
>> 3.  Use the web QC (http://qc.borland.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?ar=3770)
>> 
>> Surely one of those will work for you?
>> 
> 
> Ok, I meant 4 ways :-p
> 

> and I could not figure out how to post using the web client.

You don't get the "Add a new report" link unless you're logged in, which 
means that report creation is mostly a mystery until you accidentally 
stumble onto it for some other reason.  I reported this somewhere a long 
time ago, but evidently I didn't use QC to do it (Oh!  The irony! :-), 
because I can't find it there.

> Also, you can't post a 
> report for JDataStore7, so I commented that also.

There has always been some kind of disconnect with getting the versions 
updated.  Hopefully that will improve in the new company.  I think your 
approach is about all you can do.

-- 
Gillmer J. Derge [TeamB]

I _was_ logged in to the web client. A mystery. The windows client works 
now so I shan't puzzle about it any longer.

I have my fingers crossed re the new company. My understanding is that we 
really don't know anything now except Borland's intent to sell.


"Gillmer J. Derge [TeamB]" <spam@gillmerderge.com> wrote in news:43ff7467
@newsgroups.borland.com:

>> and I could not figure out how to post using the web client.
> 
> You don't get the "Add a new report" link unless you're logged in, which 
> means that report creation is mostly a mystery until you accidentally 
> stumble onto it for some other reason.  I reported this somewhere a long 
> time ago, but evidently I didn't use QC to do it (Oh!  The irony! :-), 
> because I can't find it there.
> 
>> Also, you can't post a 
>> report for JDataStore7, so I commented that also.
> 
> There has always been some kind of disconnect with getting the versions 
> updated.  Hopefully that will improve in the new company.  I think your 
> approach is about all you can do.
> 

John T. Dow wrote:
> I _was_ logged in to the web client. A mystery. The windows client works 
> now so I shan't puzzle about it any longer.

Hmm.  There should be a "Add a report in this area" link at the top of 
the list of existing reports.  It only shows up once you've browsed 
below the top level of the project though (strange), and I noticed 
yesterday that it's easy to miss in the sea of different navigation 
areas on the current BDN web site template.  There are about 7 or 8 
different places where you can normally find links and actions, and "the 
top of the page" is yet another one in addition to the normal places. 
Yikes!

> I have my fingers crossed re the new company. My understanding is that we 
> really don't know anything now except Borland's intent to sell.

We don't know a lot of specifics, but there has been a fair amount of 
general information.  The Delphi guys, in particular, have been blogging 
about the process quite a bit.  One interesting fact that showed up this 
week is that there have been at least 3 prospective buyers already, and 
they expect a few more.  So that's some welcome news.

-- 
Gillmer J. Derge [TeamB]