Thread View: borland.public.together.documentation
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Phil Chudley
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:22
Iteration order in Activity Diagrams
Author: Phil Chudley
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:22
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:22
9 lines
1334 bytes
1334 bytes
Does anyone know of a way to iterate though the elements on an activity diagram in a specified order, other than the defualt alahpabetical sequence used in the project? I know there is an order (sort) tab on the iterator properties, but what I am looking for is stepping through the elements in the flow sequence for each partition in an acticity diagram Thanks
Re: Iteration order in Activity Diagrams
Author: ElenaA
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:09
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:09
16 lines
1525 bytes
1525 bytes
you can develop your own extension to GenDoc that would return a set of activity nodes in your preferred order, and use this extension as programmed iteration scope "Phil Chudley" <pchudley@dthmoas.co.uk> wrote in message news:455871d5@newsgroups.borland.com... > Does anyone know of a way to iterate though the elements on an activity > diagram in a specified order, other than the defualt alahpabetical > sequence used in the project? > > I know there is an order (sort) tab on the iterator properties, but what I > am looking for is stepping through the elements in the flow sequence for > each partition in an acticity diagram > > Thanks >
Re: Iteration order in Activity Diagrams
Author: Leonid Rudy
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:39
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:39
21 lines
1945 bytes
1945 bytes
If it concerns Together Architect (or earlier versions), that feature has been already supported directly in templates (without programming any external Java classes) yet as early as two years ago in an independent product called DocFlex/Together: (see http://www.filigris.com/products/docflex_together/), which effectively is the next generation of that very "GenDoc". This may probably work now even in the freeware edition of that product. Best regards, Leonid Rudy P.S. That would have been supported long ago in all recent versions of Together, if only Borland was willing to move a finger to improve life of their own customers. Unfortunately, it seems, Borland isn't selling a technology in the first place, rather they are selling themselves! (And not so much effective, by the way, just look for instance at their earning reports at: http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/rcnews.asp?Symbol=BORL)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads