🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: borland.public.together.documentation
4 messages
4 total messages Started by Srdjan Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:45
documentation tag in Together for VS.Net
#58
Author: Srdjan
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:45
12 lines
1364 bytes
Hi,

we'd like to switch to Together for Visual Studio, but found one thing 
that is treated as a show stopper: we can't find a way to document 
classes, methods etc in the model. There are a number of properties for 
those elements, but not the one for the textual description. It seems 
like an obvious requirement of the modeling tool, and I'm sure that we 
are missing something.

Please help.

Srdjan
Re: documentation tag in Together for VS.Net
#59
Author: ElenaA
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:07
21 lines
1672 bytes
this feature is delayed to the future versions. For now I can recommend
entering
<summary> tags manually.  Note that <summary> comment should immediately
precede the
declaration to get it appear in docs generated by TVS.

"Srdjan" <knezevicfirstname_at_yahoo_com@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:418f4029$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Hi,
>
> we'd like to switch to Together for Visual Studio, but found one thing
> that is treated as a show stopper: we can't find a way to document
> classes, methods etc in the model. There are a number of properties for
> those elements, but not the one for the textual description. It seems
> like an obvious requirement of the modeling tool, and I'm sure that we
> are missing something.
>
> Please help.
>
> Srdjan
>
Re: documentation tag in Together for VS.Net
#60
Author: Srdjan
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:31
40 lines
2447 bytes
Thanks for the reply. However, this doesn't help. We need a way to 
define class responsibilites, describe what the method does, what the 
field is used for etc. during modeling. Generated documentation is not 
that much of a concern, it's the documentation in the model that is 
important to us.

Is there a way to add the property to the class, method, etc? Any 
alternatives (besides sticking notes to the model elements)?

Thanks in advance.

Srdjan

ElenaA wrote:

> this feature is delayed to the future versions. For now I can recommend
> entering
> <summary> tags manually.  Note that <summary> comment should immediately
> precede the
> declaration to get it appear in docs generated by TVS.
> 
> "Srdjan" <knezevicfirstname_at_yahoo_com@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:418f4029$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>we'd like to switch to Together for Visual Studio, but found one thing
>>that is treated as a show stopper: we can't find a way to document
>>classes, methods etc in the model. There are a number of properties for
>>those elements, but not the one for the textual description. It seems
>>like an obvious requirement of the modeling tool, and I'm sure that we
>>are missing something.
>>
>>Please help.
>>
>>Srdjan
>>
> 
> 
> 
Re: documentation tag in Together for VS.Net
#62
Author: ElenaA
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:59
45 lines
2450 bytes
TVS doesn't support adding custom properties :((

"Srdjan" <knezevicfirstname_at_yahoo_com@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4191ee00@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Thanks for the reply. However, this doesn't help. We need a way to
> define class responsibilites, describe what the method does, what the
> field is used for etc. during modeling. Generated documentation is not
> that much of a concern, it's the documentation in the model that is
> important to us.
>
> Is there a way to add the property to the class, method, etc? Any
> alternatives (besides sticking notes to the model elements)?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Srdjan
>
> ElenaA wrote:
>
> > this feature is delayed to the future versions. For now I can recommend
> > entering
> > <summary> tags manually.  Note that <summary> comment should immediately
> > precede the
> > declaration to get it appear in docs generated by TVS.
> >
> > "Srdjan" <knezevicfirstname_at_yahoo_com@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:418f4029$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>we'd like to switch to Together for Visual Studio, but found one thing
> >>that is treated as a show stopper: we can't find a way to document
> >>classes, methods etc in the model. There are a number of properties for
> >>those elements, but not the one for the textual description. It seems
> >>like an obvious requirement of the modeling tool, and I'm sure that we
> >>are missing something.
> >>
> >>Please help.
> >>
> >>Srdjan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads