🚀 go-pugleaf

similar code works fine in both Architect & TCC 6.2... What kind of problems 
have you faced?

"Anand " <anand.dixit@ecanarys.com> wrote in message 
news:4279aef2$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> Hi I wrote the following code to access the diagrams of TogetherArchitect 
> but the same code does not work with Together Control Center 6.2 any body 
> has a solution
>
> void processPackages(RwiPackage rootPackage) throws IOException {
>        String pName = rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.NAME);
>        if (pName.endsWith("dfActivity")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=ACTIVITY 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfClass")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=CLASS 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processClassDiagram(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfSequence")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=SEQUENCE 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfComponent")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=COMPONENT 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfDeployment")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram 
> type=DEPLOYMENT name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfState")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=STATE 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfUseCase")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=USECASE 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<" + 
> rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.SHAPE_TYPE) + "    name=\"" +
>                rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.NAME) + "\">");
>            RwiPackageEnumeration roots = rootPackage.subpackages();
>            while (roots.hasMoreElements()) {
>                RwiPackage pack = roots.nextRwiPackage();
>                processPackages(pack);
>            }
>            fileWriter.write("\r\n</" + 
> rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.SHAPE_TYPE) + ">");
>        }
>    } 

Hi,

My guess is that you just have different settings for the diagram files 
format. Both versions support *.df* (native for Control Center) and *.txv* 
(used when compatibility with newer product lines is needed). So in case you 
have option set to use new format, checking for pName.endsWith("dfSequence") 
may not work.

Check option at General / Use legacy DF diagram format.

BTW I believe checking RwiProperty.SHAPE_TYPE for package or its physical 
diagram (for folder packages)would give more reliable (and format 
independent) result.

best regards
  Konstantin

"Anand " <anand.dixit@ecanarys.com> wrote in message 
news:4279aef2$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> Hi I wrote the following code to access the diagrams of TogetherArchitect 
> but the same code does not work with Together Control Center 6.2 any body 
> has a solution
>
> void processPackages(RwiPackage rootPackage) throws IOException {
>        String pName = rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.NAME);
>        if (pName.endsWith("dfActivity")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=ACTIVITY 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfClass")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=CLASS 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processClassDiagram(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfSequence")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=SEQUENCE 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfComponent")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=COMPONENT 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfDeployment")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram 
> type=DEPLOYMENT name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfState")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=STATE 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else if (pName.endsWith("dfUseCase")) {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<diagram type=USECASE 
> name=" + pName + ">");
>            processDiagrams(rootPackage);
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "</diagram>");
>        } else {
>            fileWriter.write(tabs(0, true, true) + "<" + 
> rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.SHAPE_TYPE) + "    name=\"" +
>                rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.NAME) + "\">");
>            RwiPackageEnumeration roots = rootPackage.subpackages();
>            while (roots.hasMoreElements()) {
>                RwiPackage pack = roots.nextRwiPackage();
>                processPackages(pack);
>            }
>            fileWriter.write("\r\n</" + 
> rootPackage.getProperty(RwiProperty.SHAPE_TYPE) + ">");
>        }
>    } 

Well the problem was with class diagrams. When the class is directly added to the package, TCC does not create a .dfClass file instead all classes are stored in a .dfPackage itself. But when user chooses to add a new class diagram the a .dfClass diagram is created and my code works fine in that case. It failed to work if the class is directly added to the package. I did handle it in a different fassion thanks for all replies