Re: SQL or not (another angle)

Article View: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql

Article #1536

Back to borland.public.vdbase.data.sql Previous Next

#1536

From: Anthony Lopresti
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 00:00

11 lines
1100 bytes

What if I try a hybrid solution?  The data I'm most concerned about sharing
is our customer file.  We only have about 1500 records in our customer
table.  I'm guessing I would see no appreciable difference between SQL
Server and DBF files for a file so small.  On the other hand, I have 1.2
million records in my transaction table, so it sounds like I want to stick
with a DBF for my transactions.  But, I need relations between my
transaction table and my customer table and (maybe) vice-versa.

How 'bout it?  Will a hybrid solution like this give my the data sharing
and performance features (even with relations between the two methods)?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01bceebd$2565f600$a8fba126@LoprestA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <01bcebc7$dd08ec20$a8fba126@LoprestA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff5a1,ef8a746a45c3dbae
X-Google-Attributes: gidff5a1,public
From: "Anthony Lopresti" <anthonylNOSPAM@lawdiary.com>
Subject: Re: SQL or not (another angle)
Date: 1997/11/11
Message-ID: <01bceebd$2565f600$a8fba126@LoprestA>
X-Deja-AN: 288642565
References: <01bcebc7$dd08ec20$a8fba126@LoprestA>
Organization: Skinder-Strauss Associates
Newsgroups: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql

Reply to Parent Message