🚀 go-pugleaf

Geoff,

I finally beat the beast, getting help from Alan's OODML.HOW (the params
property did it).  Anyway, the end results are essentially th same as a
DMD would have been (all created via drag-n-drop).  Each rowset (except
the first) has a master-detail link with the rowset above it.

The question I now have is why do you say SQL with .DBF is not
recommended when the SQL designer is the same one that would be used to
create the DMD?  Am I not seeing the forest because of all the trees?

Thanks.

Geoff S. Wass wrote:
> The use of SQL with .DBF tables is not normally recommended. The
> recommended method for .DBF tables it to use a dataModule with the
> master-detail type of linking. There are two advantages: (1) is runs 
> at least as fasts as SQL if not faster; (2) the result is always 
> updateable while SQL generally results in read-only views.
> 
> Re-do this using a dataModule and master-detail linking. It is easy 
> and worth the effort.

Craig
Gator Custom Software
------------------------------------------------------------
"If A Computer Crashes In Cyberspace, Does It Make A Sound?"