🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT), Dacato <tfitzpat@mts.net>
wrote:

>On Jul 19, 5:13�pm, Steve <stevencan...@yahooooo.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:38 -0700, "6139 Dead, 1282 since 1/20/09"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <d...@dead.net> wrote:
>> >On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:16:24 -0500, Anonymous <a...@anon.bla> wrote:
>>
>> >>Light the China Blue Touch Paper <chine.b...@yahoo.com> �wrote :
>>
>> >>> In article <wsCdnapeMu9VOr7TnZ2dnUVZ_jedn...@forethought.net>,
>> >>> �Susan B Free <Susa...@B-Free.xyz> wrote:
>>
>> >>>> Obama Officials Play Chicken Little With the Debt Ceiling
>>
>> >>> Is that worse than Republicans playing chucken with the debt limit?
>>
>> >>Why would Obummer threaten to veto Cut Cap & Balance, UNLESS he wants to
>> >>spend us into collapse?
>>
>> >Because Cut, Cap and Balance is just exortion by a pack of neo-fascist
>> >morons who want to screw over the American people to cover up their
>> >fuckups.
>>
>> <chuckle> Forcing the government to be responsible is "extortion" in
>> the eyes of leftist loons like Jamieson..
>>
>> �It's clear that finance and economics will never be the
>> strong suits of Jamieson or Shook. �See below:
>>
>> "companies are literally hoarding "cash." And by
>> definition, if they have the cash, it's not in
>> circulation. Money is zero-sum, which means, every
>> dollar a company holds onto is a dollar that isn't
>> in circulation. "
>> --Milt Shook
>> .http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/a3be1dd3b08...
>>
>> "Bubbles, YOU'RE the one saying if we take money out of
>> general circulation, the economy will improve."
>> --David (Zepp) Jamieson stupidly claiming that corporate
>> cash reserves "take money out of circulation"
>> .http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/9d77036a53c7...
>>
>> Canyon Note: �
>>
>> There's two kinds of cash... �there's currency and then there's
>> non-currency cash like your checking and saving's account,
>> and the cash equivalents... �only currency is what can be taken
>> out of circulation, whle the noncurrency cash is only a
>> reference to some unspecified currency, which, of course,
>> is in circulation.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Unfortunately you are on the wrong side of this argument. The proposal
>that Obama put forth has more spending cuts than anything that the
>Republicans have put forth and yet he is being accused of not being
>serious about spending cuts. How do YOU explain this hypocrisy?

<ROTFL>  Obammy has never "put forth" any proposal, you pathetic
clown...