🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <30ecd4$73r@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU>,
Drew Eckhardt <drew@frisbee.cs.Colorado.EDU> wrote:
>In article <30cnl9$gt8@csnews.cs.colorado.edu>,
>Kelvin W. Fedrick <fedrick@moet.cs.colorado.edu> wrote:
>>In article <massenga.774457568@spot.Colorado.EDU>,
>>MASSENGALE MELANIE O <massenga@spot.Colorado.EDU> wrote:
>>>
>>>I fear the growth of intolerance in this country.
>>
>><chuckle> I just have to step in here. This is REALLY funny coming from someone
>>who just a few posting back told someone "if that's you're attitude then move
>>to Colorado Springs." Let me ask a question. Have these PK's advocated or tried
>>to forcibly take any rights away from you or any other woman? I think not. 
>
>Has the KKK recently advocated or tried to forcibly take any rights away
>from blacks?  Has the American Nazi party recently advocated or tried to 
>forcibly take rights away from Jews or other groups?

Um, yes. The neonazi groups in Idaho advocate creating an all white confederacy
of states and giving non-whites 24 hours to get out or lose their freedom (or
is it lose their lives, I forget which).

>Just because a group merely preaches inequality doesn't mean it's 
>view points aren't offensive.

Yup. But first tell me what inequalities the PK's have preached, and don't give
me the old recycled propoganda the Boulder PC crowd has invented about them.
Second, be offended all you want, but so long as they aren't bothering you why
are you going out of your way to bother them SOLEY on the basis of their
difference in beliefs. Isn't that the antithesis of TOLERANT behaviour?

>
>>So
>>the major part of you objections comes from their beliefs vs. yours, and YOU
>>can't tolerate them having a belief that conflict with yours (by the way, do
>>you really even KNOW what their beliefs are? Can you give us a nice short
>>summary? Or are you just attributing things to them cause you heard someone
>>else say it?). And whereas THEY haven't come around trying to do anything to
>>limit your rights, you (well at least others here) HAVE waged a campaign of
>>harrassment and slander against them in an effort to keep them from doing
>>something that thousands of other groups do in boulder all the time, have
>>a stinking little meeting. 
>
>At CU, we have problems scheduling concerts which might draw 20,000 people 
>due to the traffic, noise, and other crowd releated problems.  .  I find it 
>somewhat hypocritical that in spite of that, we can have a gathering of 50,000
>people lasting several days, with the participants present during peak
>traffic hours.

The only time I've heard of major stinks with scheduling at CU was back when
they wanted to have a big concert (1) during the school year (2) during the
weekday (3) while there where night classes in session. Other than that CU
has never given a squat about traffic.

-kelvin