🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: boulder.general
Article #703

Re: Promise Keeper's might stay

#703
From: Jill Lundquist
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 1994 20:18
49 lines
3324 bytes
In article <nduehrCt8nGy.6BD@netcom.com>,
Nathan N. Duehr <nduehr@netcom.com> wrote:
>
> [...] Of course you fail to 
>mention that Mr. McCartney and the group in general represent a group of 
>men who hope to offer a much better solution than abortion.  They 
>proclaim that sex was meant for procreation and the strengthening of a 
>godly marriage, but was never intended to be a selfish act of 
>sensuality.  They also proclaim that men in general need to follow 
>through on promises made to their families and to in general be more 
>responsible for the actions taken in relationships, including not 
>allowing themselves to be tempted into sexual relations before there is 
>any marriage commitment, therefore there would be no need for measures as 
>extreme and deadly as abortion.

First, I consider this an entirely separate issue from whether 
the Promise Keepers are welcome in Boulder.  I do not object to
the PKs' presence in Boulder if they can keep their impact to a
reasonable level, or at least I won't grouse about it any more 
than I mutter about the Bolder Boulder or CU football games.

But, on the topic at hand I will say that your information is
incorrect.  A significant percentage of women seeking abortions are
married.  I regret than I cannot remember what percentage it is,
but I recall that I was surprised when I read it; accidental
pregnancy is so often looked at as a problem only for single
women.  Even if every unmarried person refrained from the kind of
sex that could potentially lead to pregnancy, abortion would be
needed.  It's a very sad fact that contraception is as imperfect
for married folks as it is for unmarried ones, and even a godly
marriage may not be able to adequately raise a child at the time of
an unplanned pregnancy.  <sigh>  I wish it were as simple as you
make it out to be!

I don't have much to say on the rest of what you said above because
I don't know how to distinguish a selfish act of sensuality from
an unselfish one without looking into the individuals involved,
and I have no idea what sets a godly marriage apart from an ungodly 
one.  In other words, I don't know what you mean, so I can neither
agree nor disagree.  I can only correct the factual error. 

Please note followups.

Regards,

-- 
Jill Lundquist		jill@cs.colorado.edu		DoD #882

When hell freezes over, grab the ice skates.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <30k0r4$fes@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!boulder!csnews!eclipse.cs.colorado.edu!jill
References: <Ct182K.KFu@cnsnews.Colorado.EDU> <30ae5r$3ob@ncar.ucar.edu> <massenga.774507432@spot.Colorado.EDU> <nduehrCt8nGy.6BD@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,18d252bafc7d76e2
X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public
X-Google-Thread: fa291,18d252bafc7d76e2
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa291,public
X-Google-Thread: f49ec,18d252bafc7d76e2
X-Google-Attributes: gidf49ec,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-21 08:31:27 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!boulder!csnews!eclipse.cs.colorado.edu!jill
From: jill@eclipse.cs.colorado.edu (Jill Lundquist)
Newsgroups: boulder.general,boulder.pk,co.general
Subject: Re: Promise Keeper's might stay
Followup-To: talk.abortion
Date: 20 Jul 1994 20:18:44 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <30k0r4$fes@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU>
References: <Ct182K.KFu@cnsnews.Colorado.EDU> <30ae5r$3ob@ncar.ucar.edu> <massenga.774507432@spot.Colorado.EDU> <nduehrCt8nGy.6BD@netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eclipse.cs.colorado.edu