🚀 go-pugleaf

by  Erich Gliebe

Since hindsight is 20/20, we can look back now and say that,
unfortunately, the Founding Fathers were more worried about freedom
than about race. Their viewpoint is understandable; in their day,
pretty much everyone was White, and it was assumed that things would
stay that way. Blacks were a tiny and enslaved minority, and it was
assumed that things would stay that way. The media didn't have nearly
the power that it has today, and no Jews controlled the media that did
exist, and it was assumed that things would stay that way. 
 
And so the Founding Fathers spent most of their time tackling the
problems that were the most pressing to them: a system of government
based on a checks-and-balances system, freedom of speech and of the
press, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, freedom
from unreasonable searches and seizures, and so on. Their attempt to
lay out a non-tyrannical system of government resulted in the United
States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights served to limit, as best
the Fathers could foresee, the potentially-intrusive power of that
government. 
 
So, despite the understanding that the new nation was - to the core -
a White nation that was meant to remain White, the Founding Fathers
didn't explicitly make the United States a White racial state. They
didn't put the White race at the top of their list of priorities
because everyone was on the same page on the matter. It was understood
that temporary agreements might be made with the Indians, but
virtually all White Americans at the time of the nation's founding
viewed the relationship between Whites and Indians as a "Them vs. Us"
relationship. There might be temporary alliances�but only temporary
ones. Blacks were valuable as workers on the plantations, but they
were definitely second- or third-class citizens. Of course, today we
know that NO number of non-Whites must be permitted within the White
racial state that we in the National Alliance envision, but we'll deal
with that later.
 
A hundred and fifty years later, when Adolf Hitler came to power in
Germany, he and many other National Socialists from every nation in
Europe clearly understood the need to be explicit about race. From
years of contact with Jews in Germany and from seeing the debilitating
effect of integration and mongrelization on the vitality of
neighboring France, Hitler made race the foremost issue throughout
Germany, and hundreds of thousands of non-German Europeans welcomed
his putting race at the front and center of European politics. From
the open-arms welcome that German troops received throughout much of
conquered Europe - especially in Eastern Europe, where the people knew
firsthand of the communist poison - to the volunteer military units of
every European nationality that were formed to destroy that poison, it
was clear to Europeans at the time that National Socialism, far from
being merely a Pan-German Folk movement, was a new philosophy that was
meant to embrace the entire White race. 
 
But the Founding Fathers lacked the long-term, close contact with the
non-White races that the National Socialists knew about in the 1920s
and 1930s, and that we know about today. And because they focused on
freedom rather than racial integrity, the Founding Fathers
inadvertently have put us in the position today in which we have
nearly lost BOTH our freedom and our racial integrity. 
 
The love of freedom is a trait that all humans possess to some degree
but, according to the late founder of the National Alliance, Dr.
William L. Pierce, our race has a particularly strong regard for
individual freedom. We don't like to be told what to do, and we'll
continue doing what we don't what to do for only so long. Furthermore,
we don't like to be told what to think: what's right and what's wrong,
which ideas about God are correct, and so on. 
 
The love of these freedoms is what drove our European ancestors by the
millions to make the journey to America to start a new life. Some
wanted the freedom to worship as they wished to. Some came in search
of land and opportunity. But in every case, it all boiled down to
freedom: freedom to think and act how they wanted to, freedom to be
their own masters on land that provided for their needs and brought in
an adequate income as well, and freedom to live in peace without the
interference of tyrannical rulers whose concerns were more focused on
keeping the royal coffers filled than on the well-being of the people.
 
And the nation that the Founding Fathers constructed was a direct
reflection of these shared values regarding freedom. Individual
freedom was maximized and the power of the government that was
agreed-upon to be necessary was kept to a minimum. With the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights, it seemed that a utopia on Earth
had finally been achieved, and that utopian vision is still the one
that is pumped into the heads of American schoolchildren, despite the
fact that it is pure fantasy.  
 
There were two problems with the new democratic system as it was set
up by the Founding Fathers. The first, which I've already mentioned,
was that there was very little explicit reference to race, and there
was very little put into place that was meant to ensure the racial
integrity of the nation. This flaw will prove fatal in the end, as we
are clearly seeing in everything that goes on around us today. Even
before the nation was one hundred years old, this flaw had created a
rift in the country that led to the Civil War which, unfortunately,
only weakened the White racial stock of the country and did nothing in
the way of fixing this flaw. In fact, eventually, the Civil War only
led to even more breaches of the wall of racial integrity. Explicit
White racialism from Day One - rather than implicit racialism - might
have channeled the energies of the nation into more productive
channels over the past two centuries. 
 
Anyway, the other problem with the new democratic system was the
assumption that every man - or, in the words of the Naturalization Act
of 1790, every "free white person" - will take an active interest in
the governance of the nation. In other words, the idea of a government
"by the people" is a myth. Most people are far more concerned with
their own lives than with the activities of government and,
furthermore, most either don't want to take the time or don't have the
mental wherewithal to understand all of the policies and actions of
government. The only time that most people start paying close
attention to what the government is doing is when its actions directly
affect their lives and livelihoods. In a letter to John Hancock,
George Washington complained about the self-centeredness among the men
of the Continental Army: 
"When men are irritated, & the Passions inflamed, they fly hastily,
and chearfully to Arms, but after the first emotions are over to
expect that they are influenced by any other principles than those of
Interest, is to look for what never did, & I fear never will happen."
 
So, contrary to the assumptions of a supposedly freedom-loving
democracy, self-interest rules the roost, and participating actively
in running the country is way down on the list of priorities for most
people. And that is a good thing, because if everyone wanted to
actively participate in governing the country, it would be total
chaos. Nothing would ever get done, and a smoothly-running society
would be out of the question. 
 
Unfortunately, because there were essentially no explicit principles
of White racialism in the founding of America, a certain group with an
egomaniacal self-interest took advantage of the freedoms that WERE
explicit and soon came to dominate the nation. That group, of course,
was the Jews. In this country, they started out mainly in the world of
trade and commerce, and later moved into finance and the fledgling
mass media. Today, our country is riddled with them, from the media
moguls and the financial giants to the advisors of government and the
"leading thinkers and doers" in every field of endeavor. 
 
And obviously, the weight of the media contributes to Jewish
advancement everywhere. That is WHY there are so many Jewish stars in
music and Hollywood; that is WHY Jews seem to be at the top of every
field of endeavor; that is WHY Israel is venerated by every mass media
outlet; that is WHY most Americans probably think that criticizing the
Jews is a criminal offense, even though it isn't - YET. 
 
And the Jewish establishment now uses the American government, which
was established to preserve freedom, to take away the right of Iraqis
and Afghans to rule themselves. The Jewish establishment now uses the
American government to take away the rights of American citizens so
that illegal immigrants can further pollute what's left of the White
racial gene pool in this country. 
 
On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was signed on the
understanding that it was immoral for one political entity to coerce
another to do its bidding. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights
were signed on the understanding that it was immoral for the state to
coerce its citizens to think and act in a certain way. The freedoms
that Americans have taken for granted for more than two centuries are
meant to protect U.S. citizens from coercion - from having to do what
someone else wants one to do. 
 
Unfortunately, the Jews have taken those freedoms, used them to gain
their present posts of power, and are now flexing that power to coerce
the rest of us to think and act like THEY want us to. They WANT us to
welcome more and more non-Whites into our country. They WANT our young
people to turn away from their own racial heritage, to become
Africanized through Black music, and to court and wed non-Whites. And
the freedoms that we have to speak out against all of this? They want
to destroy them.  
 
White racialists want freedom for our race. We see what a multiracial
society does to all of its members, and we are tired of being coerced
by a Jewish establishment that cares not a whit for our freedoms,
either the freedom of our whole race or our freedom to speak out
against what we see as wrong, not to mention our freedom to defend
ourselves by force of arms. 
 
On this Independence Day weekend, I'd like you to imagine the spirit
of excitement and unity that would pulse through the all-White nation
that we in the National Alliance are striving to bring into being. And
then I'd like you to choose to do something about it, by joining
forces with me and the other members of the National Alliance. With an
all-White nation with an explicitly racialist foundation, our racial
freedoms and our individual freedoms will pave the way for a new and
glorious future for our people. 
 


http://www.ihr.org/     http://www.natvan.com   http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/   http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/