Article View: boulder.general
Article #766Re: Promise Keeper's might stay
From: Gary Strand
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 1994 17:02
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 1994 17:02
51 lines
3306 bytes
3306 bytes
bw> Bryce Wilcox
gs> Gary Strand
gs> The PKers are not some monolithic group out to seize political power;
they're men who want to live their lives as good Christians.
bw> Are you unaware of the Religious Right's political agenda?
I am quite aware. I'm also aware of the political agendas of lots of groups
of people, some of whom are worse than the RR. Besides, the PKers and the
RR are not one and the same.
bw> Or of its growing influence?
Ah yes, and there are Commies under every bed. Their influence will grow
only if everyone else lets it. Don't blame me for the fact that people
don't give a damn about voting.
bw> Do you think that having public schools teach Creationism, or making sex
between members of the same gender illegal is harmless?
I'd rather public schools didn't exist as they are now. A voucher system
would be a good start. That way, all the loonies can go to the school of
their choice -- one that teaches Creationism, say, or one that teaches
that the Americas were a paradise-on-earth before the evil white man con-
quered and raped them.
I'd also like to get rid of nearly all the sex-related laws. This is where
I have the biggest problem with the RR.
What about their views on laws that sanction abortion? Aren't those laws
harmful too?
bw> The PK'ers are a group of people who explicitly and actively advocate the
philosophy which leads to laws such as those.
So? Advocating a philosophy isn't sufficient reason to censor someone. Not
yet, at least. There are philosophies at least as odorous as that of the
PKers; are you prejudiced against those who believe them as well?
bw> As such they are dangerous. To me, to my friends, to my descendants, and
to many many other people. They need to be argued against and denounced.
Argued against. Denounced is a little too strong. Besides, the PKers are
hardly the biggest threat to our liberties. We have a woma- er, I mean,
*man* in the White House who has already damaged our liberties and intends
to inflict a great deal more damage.
--
Gary Strand Opinions stated herein are mine
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu alone and are not representative
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cscor/gary/index.html of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30riea$8u5@ncar.ucar.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!decwrl!decwrl!enews.sgi.com!sgigate.sgi.com!sgiblab!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!ncar!titanic.cgd.ucar.edu!garyReferences:
<30puoo$e62@lace.Colorado.EDU> <30q792$mbr@ncar.ucar.edu> <30q8g9$il4@lace.Colorado.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fa291,18d252bafc7d76e2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa291,public X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,18d252bafc7d76e2 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public X-Google-Thread: f49ec,18d252bafc7d76e2 X-Google-Attributes: gidf49ec,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-23 18:06:31 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!decwrl!decwrl!enews.sgi.com!sgigate.sgi.com!sgiblab!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!ncar!titanic.cgd.ucar.edu!gary From: gary@titanic.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) Newsgroups: boulder.general,boulder.pk,co.general Subject: Re: Promise Keeper's might stay Date: 23 Jul 1994 17:02:02 GMT Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO Lines: 51 Message-ID: <30riea$8u5@ncar.ucar.edu> References: <30puoo$e62@lace.Colorado.EDU> <30q792$mbr@ncar.ucar.edu> <30q8g9$il4@lace.Colorado.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: titanic.cgd.ucar.edu