Article View: boulder.general
Article #818Re: Deadly Mercury In Our Food
From: Jan Drew
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:48
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:48
430 lines
16412 bytes
16412 bytes
http://www.toxicteeth.org/pressRoom_releases_031903_polluters.cfm http://www.mercurypoisoned.com/ The fact that mercury can be absorbed and reach toxic levels in human tissues makes any and all exposure to that element of scientific interest. (reach toxic levels, could this come from amalgams? It says makes *any* and*all*) Studies showing measurable elemental mercury vapor release from dental amalgams have raised renewed concern about amalgam safety. Mercury vapor absorption occurs through the lungs, with about 80% of the inhaled vapor being absorbed by the lungs and rapidly entering the bloodstream. (Where does these mercury vapor come from??) Following distribution by blood circulation, mercury can enter and remain in certain tissues for longer periods of time, since the half-life of excretion is prolonged. Two of the primaryt arget organs of concern are the central - quote - > nervous system and kidneys. (The central nervous system ah, you don't suppose my PN came from the same place as my mercury poisoning do you?) Whole-body imaging of the distribution of mercury released from dental fillings into monkey tissues (is mercury released from amalgams??) The present investigation demonstrates the bodily distribution of amalgam Hg in a monkey whose dentition, diet, feeding regimen, and chewing pattern closely resemble those of humans. When amalgam fillings, which normally contain 50% Hg, are made with a tracer of radioactive 203Hg and then placed into monkey teeth, the isotope appears in high concentration in various organs and tissues within 4wk. Research in molecular biology has elucidated mechanisms that may underlie the toxic effects of mercury. Studies of the effects of mercury on the immune system in rodents have enhanced knowledge of the mechanisms whereby mercury affects the immune system. Clinical studies of occupationally exposed employees have objectively confirmed subclinical influence of mercury on the immune system at low levels of mercury exposure. The thyroid has been identified as the target organ for the toxic effect of mercury in occupational exposure to mercury vapour in low doses. Clinical studies of the effects of mercury on occupationally exposed workers, using modern diagnostic methods, have elucidated the connection between dose and effect. They have also identified and quantified neuropsychological symptoms at low exposure levels. Relation between symptoms and mercury concentrations in saliva after chewing. The Tübingen amalgam study could establish in the especially examined group of 21-40 year old persons a statistically significant relation between mercury levels in saliva and symptoms. Only symptoms which are characteristic of subacute or chronic mercury exposure in the low-level range were studied. Low-level chronic exposures to mercury may affect the peripheral nervous system resulting in polyneuropathies (reduced sensory and motor nerve function) and neuropsychological effects (visual alterations, sensory loss, stress) (ATSDR 1989); these effects correlate to tissue levels of 20 to 40 µg/g. Neuropsychological effects were also reported by Smith et al. (1970) for occupational exposure to mercury levels of > 0.1 mg/m3. Mercury concentrations below this value did not appear to cause observable effects. Kishi et al. (1993) reported that neurobehavioral and motor function effects persisted in ex-mercury miners more than 10 years after cessation of exposure. Once inhaled, elemental mercury is mostly converted to an inorganic divalent or mercuric form by catalase in the red blood cells. This inorganic form has similar properties to organic mercury. Small amounts of non-oxidized elemental mercury continue to persist and account for CNS toxicity. Elemental mercury, as a vapor, which escapes from fillings, penetrates the blood-brain-barrier and enters the CNS, where it's ionized and trapped, attributing to its significant toxic effects Environmental Effect of Dental Amalgam Mercury is one of the most toxic substances commonly encountered, and according to Government agencies causes adverse health effects in large numbers of people in the U.S.[1] The extreme toxicity of mercury can be seen from documented effects on wildlife by very low levels of mercury exposure. The average amalgam filling has more than ½ gram of mercury, and has been documented to continuously leak mercury into the body of those with amalgam fillings due to the low mercury vapor pressure and galvanic current induced by mixed metals in the mouth. 1. Hg plasma concentration correlated with no.of amalgam fillings. http://tinyurl.com/cdb0 2003 2. Correlation between number of fillings and salivary Hg. http://tinyurl.com/cgs 2000 3. The amount of organic and inorganic mercury in paraffin-stimulated saliva was significantly higher in subjects with dental amalgam fillings http://tinyurl.com/cgs1 2001 4. Mercury vapour release increases with chewing, with absorption and uptake by the brain and kidneys. http://tinyurl.com/cczd 2002 5. Amalgam causes nerve cell toxicity in culture. http://tinyurl.com/ccyo 2003 6. Plasma concentrations of mercury before and after treatment supported the metal exposure to be causative for the ill health. http://tinyurl.com/ccyr 2002 7 None of the materials tested consistently prevented microleakage. http://tinyurl.com/cfcg 2002 8. In neither of the nonamalgam groups was this [wastewater] limit exceeded, but 20.5% in the amalgam group exceeded the limit http://tinyurl.com/ccyu 2002 9. I-Hg levels in placenta increased with an increasing number of maternal dental amalgam fillings (p < 0.001)... a substantial fraction of maternal blood I-Hg, probably as Hg(0), reached the fetus. http://tinyurl.com/cgrz 2002 10 Evidence of a pro-oxidant role of the amalgam Hg chronically released in saliva. http://tinyurl.com/cgrv 2002 11. Mercury released into air from dry abraded amalgam was shown to be above the recommended industrial limit http://tinyurl.com/cf7j 2002 http://www.chem-tox.com/pregnancy/mercury.htm Low Level Mercury Causes Behavior Problems During Pregnancy Subtle behavior problems were observed in mice offspring exposed to a single low level mercury dose. In summarizing the results of their study, the researchers stated, "This hypothesis generating study showed highly significant correlations between mood scores and most measures of low level Hg (mercury) exposure. The specific mood measures most associated with Hg exposure were tension, fatigue, and confusion. The strength of these associations suggests that mood should be included for investigation in future hypothesis-testing studies..... Among the cognitive and motor function tests, only the digit span and simple reaction time (nondominant hand) scores were associated with any measure of exposure...... Overall, and despite the small size of the study population, this investigation found some evidence of adverse preclinical effects at mercury doses averaging 36 ugs/l in urine. The mood and symptom results of this study agree with prior evaluations of both high and low urinary mercury doses. These preliminary survey findings support a critical evaluation of the adequacy of the 50 ug/g creatinine biologic threshold for mercury proposed by the World Health Organization This is the first U.S. dental study to detect potential behavioral deficits at such a low level of exposure. A larger and more comprehensive study is required to accurately determine a biologic threshold of adverse central and peripheral nervous system effects for elemental mercury." Drs. Diana Echeverria, Nicholas J. Heyer, Michael D. Martin, Conrad A Naleway Depart. of Environ. Health, Univ. of Washington, School of Dentistry, Univ. of Washington Neurotoxicology and Teratology, Vol. 17(2):161-168, 1995 Dopamine Uptake in Brain Cells Changed By Methylmercury Attention Deficit Disorder children were reported in other headings in this book as having altered dopamine levels. Several compounds, including alcohol, have been shown to alter dopamine levels in test animals. Now, researchers at Duke University Medical School have shown that even very low levels of methylmercury result in dopamine and norepinephrine brain neurotransmitter changes. Important : Citations of scientific journal references found in this web page, and on this website are for journalistic and educational purposes only, presented as a free exchange of ideas. They do not represent a recommendation, endorsement, diagnosis, nor prescription for any health disorder or remedy by the authors, or their publishers. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mercury exposure from mercury dental fillings, also known as "silver" fillings and "amalgams", is a life long threat. When a person chews, drinks, swallows and breathes, mercury released from dental fillings is absorbed by the lungs and the linings of the digestive system into the bloodstream. As they corrode, mercury fillings release ionized mercury into the saliva, tooth pulp, and gum tissues leading to the digestive system and bloodstream. Measurements of momentary mercury levels in breath have been scientifically collected in multiple studies. There has been much debate about the potential safety hazard because mercury vapor levels measured in the mouth are not always above the standards set for exposure in the workplace. Overlooked has been the amount of mercury in feces, which demonstrates both exposure and excretion from the blood and tissues by the liver. The levels measured by Osterblad et. al. in the article "Antimicrobial and mercury resistance in aerobic gram-negative bacilli in fecal flora among persons with and without dental amalgam fillings" published in Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy, 39(11):2499-502 1995 Nov; are disturbing, and clearly demonstrate that human mercury exposure is dominated by the presence of mercury dental fillings. Osterblad found that on average people with mercury dental fillings had 17 times more mercury in their feces than did people who had never had mercury dental fillings, and had 11 times more mercury in feces than did people who had all of their mercury dental fillings removed. The group with mercury dental fillings had more than 1 part per million mercury in their feces. At the first standard deviation, the difference between these populations becomes more dramatic. People with mercury dental fillings had nearly 4 parts per million mercury in feces, 39 times more mercury than did people who never had the fillings. Osterblad's data indicates that 1 person in 1000 with mercury dental fillings will have 10 parts per million mercury in their daily feces, 170 times more mercury than the average person who has never had such a filling. The safe limit of mercury allowed by the EPA in drinking water is 2 parts per billion (see ASTDR ToxFAQ CAS# 7439-97-6) . What Osterblad found in the feces of people with mercury dental fillings was an average concentration 500 times higher than would be allowed in minimally safe drinking water. The graph below compares the amount of mercury found in feces by Osterblad et. al.. The group represented by the yellow bar had never had mercury dental fillings. The group represented by the red bar once had mercury dental fillings, but had them removed before the study. The blue bar represents the population that still had mercury dental fillings in their teeth at the time of the study. "Mercury exposure from mercury dental fillings, also known as "silver" fillings and "amalgams", is a life long threat. When a person chews, drinks, swallows and breathes, mercury released from dental fillings is absorbed by the lungs and the linings of the digestive system into the bloodstream. As they corrode, mercury fillings release ionized mercury into the saliva, tooth pulp, and gum tissues leading to the digestive system and bloodstream. Measurements of momentary mercury levels in breath have been scientifically collected in multiple studies. There has been much debate about the potential safety hazard because mercury vapor levels measured in the mouth are not always above the standards set for exposure in the workplace. Overlooked has been the amount of mercury in feces, which demonstrates both exposure and excretion from the blood and tissues by the liver. The levels measured by Osterblad et. al. in the article "Antimicrobial and mercury resistance in aerobic gram-negative bacilli in fecal flora among persons with and without dental amalgam fillings" published in Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy, 39(11):2499-502 1995 Nov; are disturbing, and clearly demonstrate that human mercury exposure is dominated by the presence of mercury dental fillings. Osterblad found that on average people with mercury dental fillings had 17 times more mercury in their feces than did people who had never had mercury dental fillings, and had 11 times more mercury in feces than did people who had all of their mercury dental fillings removed. The group with mercury dental fillings had more than 1 part per million mercury in their feces. At the first standard deviation, the difference between these populations becomes more dramatic. People with mercury dental fillings had nearly 4 parts per million mercury in feces, 39 times more mercury than did people who never had the fillings. Osterblad's data indicates that 1 person in 1000 with mercury dental fillings will have 10 parts per million mercury in their daily feces, 170 times more mercury than the average person who has never had such a filling. The safe limit of mercury allowed by the EPA in drinking water is 2 parts per billion (see ASTDR ToxFAQ CAS# 7439-97-6) . What Osterblad found in the feces of people with mercury dental fillings was an average concentration 500 times higher than would be allowed in minimally safe drinking water." http://www.cfsn.com/dental.html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5291448 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20098082 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18849934
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<61e79080-614b-4cf1-a213-49d02c90d337@a37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4453f482-a347-46b5-b038-5592582e0b9f@o11g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <8aca15ca-17e6-427d-9c97-1dd09eeb7548@n26g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <rca2c65eg6i9462nlb6q9ml169o8nm39uc@4ax.com> <0d02d064-cfca-4003-b3eb-1e68383dddd1@l14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4d54c65omkn9ql43j968ka8qgjphql85pc@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 7eeea1e742,35d98887f43f432b X-Google-Attributes: gid7eeea1e742,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Jan Drew <jdrew63929@aol.com> Newsgroups: boulder.general,co.denver.general,co.general,misc.health.alternative Subject: Re: Deadly Mercury In Our Food Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 431 Message-ID: <61e79080-614b-4cf1-a213-49d02c90d337@a37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> References: <4453f482-a347-46b5-b038-5592582e0b9f@o11g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <8aca15ca-17e6-427d-9c97-1dd09eeb7548@n26g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <rca2c65eg6i9462nlb6q9ml169o8nm39uc@4ax.com> <0d02d064-cfca-4003-b3eb-1e68383dddd1@l14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4d54c65omkn9ql43j968ka8qgjphql85pc@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.65 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1287974906 5463 127.0.0.1 (25 Oct 2010 02:48:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.116.65; posting-account=40HPKQoAAABwSFWWdvGlBjB7F-dFMkyi User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.2.1 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-dtc-tf12.proxy.aol.com[CDBC70AC] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-dtc-ab01.proxy.aol.com[CDBC7441] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM]) X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; AOL 9.0; AOLBuild 4327.5206; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0),gzip(gfe)