🚀 go-pugleaf

privette@gandalf.colorado.edu (Jeff Privette) writes:

>In article <1992Apr3.060007@eklektix.com>, rcd@raven.eklektix.com (Dick Dunn) writes:
>|> Perhaps a simple reading of the postings at hand would have been more
>|> appropriate than arguing before knowing what you're arguing about.  If
>|> you speak up before you know what's going on, you can expect sarcastic
>|> responses.  Anyway, part of people's sarcasm was because it wasn't clear
>|> you were totally clueless about the suit--it would not be unreasonable to
>|> infer that you were siding with the guy who's suing an innocent third
>|> party.
>|> 
>|> and stop sniveling!  Your apology, by itself, would have been OK.  Don't
>|> try to duck out by telling people they should be tolerant when you screw
>|> up.

>Please, please!  I really should be tarred, feathered, whipped and hanged.
>Simply rehashing on the Net what you emailed me is not good enough!
>You Net Masters (Dick and Paul) caught me in a breach of Net Etiquette,
>and as we see apologies are not accepted.  Thanks for your wisdom, boys.
>And thanks for fixing my manners.  And no, I don't believe the other guys
>in my lab who believe you guys take yourselves too seriously! (smile face,
>smile face!!!!)

Gee, If I am the Paul you are referring to, I truly don't remember having
any animosity or "putting you in your place" or even mentioning anything
about Netiquette.  Maybe there was another poster named Paul, that I 
didn't notice?  Feel free to email me if this needs to be discussed further.

>|> -- 
>|> Dick Dunn    rcd@raven.eklektix.com   -or-   raven!rcd    Boulder, Colorado
>|> 	...Simpler is better.


Paul E. Ourada
paulo@ohmeda.com