Article View: boulder.general
Article #88489Libertarian Program
From: Marc Anderson
Date: Wed, 27 May 1992 07:08
Date: Wed, 27 May 1992 07:08
514 lines
25221 bytes
25221 bytes
Here's the program of the Libertarian party.
----------- cut here ----------
LIBERTARIAN PARTY PROGRAM
Adopted by the Libertarian National Committee
28 August 1991
PREAMBLE
The Libertarian Party wants all Americans to be able to plan
their own futures. Libertarians believe that individuals, families,
associations, and businesses have the right and the ability to deal
with their own problems by working with other people in a peaceful and
honest way. We reject the idea that the aggressive use of force,
whether by criminals or government, is either a moral or practical
means for achieving positive ends. Libertarians seek a world in which
voluntary cooperation replaces force in human relationships. Toward
that end, we offer the following ten point Program.
DEFENDING AMERICANS IN AMERICA
An important reason for having the federal government is national
defense. Its job is to defend Americans in America from foreign
attack. The federal government should work to provide security for us
at the lowest possible cost, in a way which does not undermine our
domestic economic productivity or violate our civil liberties.
U. S. military spending is over $300 billion per year. Rather
than defending America, the bulk of this pays for defending other
countries. People in many of those countries pay less for their own
defense than American taxpayers pay to defend them.
The United States has many thousands of nuclear weapons more than
needed to deter a Soviet first strike, yet we spend billions every
year building more.
U. S. military intervention in Central America, Southeast Asia,
and the Middle East has not made Americans more secure. In fact,
Americans are less secure, because U. S. military policy has made us
more enemies than friends, making all Americans targets of terrorism.
American military adventurism routinely results in unnecessary
bloodshed without producing positive results. The United States
should rely less on military force and threats and more on negotiation
and trade to establish harmonious international relationships.
The Libertarian Party proposes the following initial steps to
improve the security of Americans and reduce the costs of defense:
1. Notify our allies that they must plan for their own defense needs
and take responsibility for paying for them. Provide allies with a
timetable for the return of American military personnel to America in
order to defend America.
2. Negotiate arms reduction treaties which do not compromise our
national defense.
3. Adopt a policy that Americans who travel abroad and companies
which invest abroad do so at their own risk and are subject to the
laws and customs of other countries while abroad. The United States
will no longer use gunboat diplomacy on their behalf at taxpayers'
expense.
4. Reject the "Reagan Doctrine", which engages the United States
around the globe and risks the security of all Americans by increasing
the possibility that the U. S. will become embroiled in a foreign
civil war.
FEDERAL SPENDING MUST BE CUT
Federal spending and federal taxation are connected. We must
reduce spending to reduce taxes.
Unfortunately, the United States government has expanded its
operations and spending far beyond the original constitutional plan.
No matter what the subject, there is some group which wants government
to regulate or subsidize it, and there are always those in Congress
eager to take over more power and control. But it is impossible to
get something for nothing. The government produces no goods, so it
can hand out favors to some people only by taking the earnings and
property of others first.
In recent years the government has attempted to hide its
expensive meddling by forcing private organizations and businesses to
adopt certain expensive programs, rather than have the government
implement them directly. These programs are no less costly nor less
intrusive than if they were adopted directly by the government.
Libertarians join with the vast majority of Americans in calling
for a smaller, less expensive, less meddlesome government. The
following are some first steps in the process of bringing federal
government spending under control:
1. Place the federal budget under a "cap" at current levels. Any
increase in spending on any project must be accompanied by an equal or
greater reduction in other spending.
2. Phase out spending on aid to foreign governments and international
organizations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary
Fund.
3. Phase out federal subsidies to all businesses such as the tobacco
industry, the maritime industry, agriculture, or the
military-industrial complex.
4. End federal subsidy programs to state and local governments.
These programs merely take taxes out of the community and then send
the money back, minus the amounts consumed by the government
bureaucrats who administer them.
5. End all federally mandated programs forced on individuals,
organizations, and businesses.
CHOICE IN EDUCATION
Government-run public schools have failed our children. Their
cost keeps rising while student performance drops. Today one out of
five teenagers can't even read at a grade school level, and colleges
must teach many students how to read and write.
Poor children suffer most because they attend the worst schools.
Few families can afford tuition for private schools while paying taxes
for public schools. Private schools provide better education at a
much lower cost.
Most families have no choice but to send their children to the
neighborhood public school, regardless of its quality. This makes
public schools a protected monopoly. Like most monopolies, they do a
poor job of serving the public. Education suffers.
This same lack of choice frequently compels families to send
their children to problem schools. Youngsters are exposed to
violence, drugs, and other threats. Without other choices, parents
feel helpless to change this.
The libertarian approach to education is to let parents choose
the education that is best for their child.
The following steps should be taken immediately to promote choice
and return control of education to parents and students:
1. Allow parents to send their children to the teacher and the school
of their choice by implementing a voucher system.
2. Eliminate the U. S. Department of Education which spends billions
on administration and educates no one.
3. Institute tax credits for any person or company which pays for the
education of any student, or any number of students, at any school,
public or private.
4. Remove restrictions which limit such private educational choices
as home schooling.
FREE TRADE AND NEUTRALITY
The Libertarian Party supports a foreign policy designed to
promote peace and honest trade between Americans and all other people.
Thomas Jefferson stated it: "Peace, commerce and honest friendship
with all nations, entangling alliances with none." Libertarians would
say: free trade and neutrality.
Protectionism hurts consumers. It drives up the price of
clothing, shoes, automobiles, and other goods by billions of dollars
each year. Protectionism favors special interests, eliminates jobs,
and raises the cost of living for all Americans.
Both Democratic and Republican administrations have, for many
decades, employed a foreign policy of intervention which disrupts free
trade. Since Americans would never tolerate other nations interfering
with our internal affairs, we should not interfere in theirs. We
should stop using military and covert operations to prop up or topple
any other government.
We should rely on the obvious benefits of trade to promote free
markets and human rights throughout the world. Free international
trade promotes peace because people trading with their neighbors do
not want war to interrupt their prosperity. When trade is restricted
by embargoes, quotas, and tariffs, history has shown that the
likelihood of war increases.
The following are some steps which should be taken immediately to
promote more harmonious trading relationships:
1. The United States should return to its historical foreign policy
of free trade and neutrality.
2. The United States government should repeal all laws which hamper
trade with people in other countries.
3. The United States government should repeal all laws which restrict
the right of Americans to travel to other countries.
THE SAVINGS AND LOAN FIASCO
It is difficult to imagine a better example of government
bungling than the savings and loan (S&L) bailout. The problems which
many S&Ls are experiencing is the direct result of government deposit
insurance.
For decades the government has required federally chartered S&Ls
to buy deposit insurance from a government agency -- FSLIC. FSLIC
charged premiums without regard to how the S&Ls invested their
depositor's funds. For example, consider two S&Ls that are identical
except for how they invest their funds. One buys only the highest
quality investments; the other speculates in a variety of risky
investments. FSLIC charges both S&Ls the same amount of premium to
insure their deposits.
This is insane. No life insurance company would charge the same
premiums to two 30-year-old women -- one a smoker and one a
non-smoker. Any sensible insurance scheme must base the premiums on
risk. FSLIC did not, because it was a stupid scheme setup by the
politicians. S&Ls, as an industry, wield a lot of power in Washington.
The S&L lobby has been strong enought to prevent FSLIC from charging
reasonable premiums.
Many S&Ls made risky investments that went sour. They lost not
only their shareholder's money, but some of their depositor's funds as
well. This left FSLIC holding the bag. Since FSLIC did not charge
premiums related to risk, it doesn't have enough money to pay back all
depositors. As a result the federal government -- which means we
taxpayers -- are left holding the bag. As taxpayers, we are going to
have to pay over $300 billion (over $1000 for each man, woman, and
child!) because of this bungling.
The Libertarian Party knows and understands that protecting our
hard-earned savings is far too important a job to trust to politicians
and bureaucrats. It has been tried and it has failed miserably. We
therefore propose that four federal insurance schemes be terminated:
FSLIC - which insures deposits at savings and loans
FDIC - which insures deposits at banks
SIPC - which insures cash and securities at brokerage firms
NCUIC - which insures deposits at credit unions
For years private insurance companies have insured residential
mortgages, municipal bonds, corporate securities, and investments at
brokerage firms. Based on the successful performance of these
companies as insurers, it is clear that private insurance companies
will be able to replace FSLIC, FDIC, SIPC, and NCUIC.
TAXES: THE CRUELEST BURDEN
One of the Libertarian Party's goals is to replace taxation with
voluntary methods for financing government services.
The government uses force to collect taxes. If you don't pay
taxes _voluntarily_, your property may be seized and you may be
imprisoned. Our earnings and property are taken by force if we don't
cooperate. If any organization or person other than our government
tried this, we would call it stealing. If it is wrong for private
citizens to take others' property, it is wrong when government does
it. Private citizens and companies would be called criminals for
using such methods, so it must be criminal for our government to do
it.
When taxation takes money or property from private citizens and
transfers it to government, economic productivity declines. Employers
cannot expand, businesses fail, and jobs are lost. We have seen this
repeatedly, particularly during the past 77 years since the federal
income tax was introduced. Even successful businesses must pass on
the cost of taxes to consumers. Everyone loses except the government.
Experience shows that government is inefficient. Most government
services can be provided better by private businesses, private
charities, and other community organizations.
To begin the process of replacing taxation with voluntary
financing of government activities, we propose the following:
1. Neither Congress nor any state legislature should create any new
tax or increase any tax rate from this day forward.
2. A "sunset" provision should be added to every tax statute. Such a
provision would end the particular tax after two years unless it is
re-enacted.
3. The U. S. Constitution and the state constitutions should be
amended to provide for a binding initiative process where the voters
can repeal any tax by majority vote.
4. Tax money should no longer subsidize any government service which
can possibly be provided in the private sector.
THE ENVIRONMENT
Every one of us is dependent on the environment to support our
lives. When a person, a company, or a government dumps waste from its
property onto the property of others without their consent, it has
trespassed against them. The victims of pollution should be able to
sue the polluter, require it to stop, and collect damages.
The best way to understand why we have the high level of air and
water pollution we have today is to recognize that responsibility for
protection of the environment has been turned over to a government
bureaucracy. Today's failures are a result of the ineffectiveness of
the government to deal with such important issues. Corporate officials
are often protected from liability. Various levels of government --
often the worst polluters -- impose ever greater regulations on
private parties, while hiding behind legal exemptions which permit
them to violate their own standards.
Current laws relating to the environment are not based on the
concept of trespass. These laws define acceptable levels of pollution
and attempt to prevent anyone from exceeding those levels. They fall
short of what is needed for several reasons.
By setting acceptable levels of pollution, the government is
actually approving those levels of pollution. Libertarians do not
believe that government bureaucrats in Washington should determine how
much poison we are forced to eat, drink, and breathe!
Government sanctions environmental destruction; polluters feel
safe as they poison our environment up to government accepted levels.
It is an uphill battle for an injured private citizen to sue a
polluter who has met all government guidelines. Even if the individual
has been unquestionably harmed, the polluter's claim that all
applicable government standards were met provides a strong defense.
When polluters exceed government standards, the penalties they
pay typically go to the government, not to the people who were harmed.
Why should the government be paid for poisoning private citizens? Why
shouldn't polluters compensate their victims?
Faceless bureaucrats can never be as effective in fighting
pollution as individual citizens; provided that we give citizens the
tools they need to do so. The following are some initial steps to
protect our environment.
1. Clearly establish the legal right of individuals or groups to claim
that harmful pollution of their body, property, air or water is a
trespass, allowing them to successfully sue individuals, companies, or
governments for damages.
2. End all regulatory attempts to define acceptable levels of
pollution. Setting such standards has the effect of legally
sanctioning that amount of pollution, even when it might be reduced
below that level. It also deprives citizens the right to successfully
claim damages from levels of pollution which are lower than government
standards.
SOLVING THE DRUG PROBLEM
Libertarians want to see all Americans healthy and free of drug
dependence. However, we recognize that criminal penalties for sale,
transportation, possession, or use of drugs have not solved and cannot
solve this problem. Similar penalties were tried when alcoholic
beverages were outlawed over 60 years ago. The failure of this
approach was recognized, and Prohibition was repealed.
Prohibition spawned organized crime. Today's drug laws keep it
going. Criminal penalties for drug trafficking reduce supplies, force
drug prices up, and make drug dealing very profitable. High prices
lead to violent crimes committed by a small number of addicts who may
steal or murder to feed their habits. Most victims of these crimes
are innocent non-users.
Prohibition resulted in many deaths from "bathtub gin". Today we
read of deaths from the use of adulterated drugs. There is no
difference. There is no consumer protection for impure, illegal
drugs. Dead users cannot prosecute their suppliers.
The substance that causes the greatest problem is alcohol. The
most physically damaging and most addictive is tobacco. For every
death caused by the use of illegal drugs, there are almost 100 deaths
caused by the use of alcohol or tobacco. Yet few suggest that either
alcohol or tobacco should be banned.
The Libertarian Party does not advocate the use of drugs. The
libertarian approach recognizes that the drug problem is worsened by
the use of criminal law to attempt to halt drug use. However foolish
people may be, they should have the right and the responsibility to
determine for themselves what to put in their own bodies. The law
should reflect that.
The following reforms should be instituted immediately:
1. Relegalize the possession of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and other
controlled substances for personal use. Alaska and the Netherlands
have already done this for marijuana and experienced no problems. The
British have done this for heroin with similar results.
2. Hold people who commit crimes or cause accidents while under the
influence of any drug (including alcohol) fully liable for their
actions.
3. Repeal all laws and regulations which impede the establishment of
private drug treatment programs.
IMMIGRATION
America grew and developed as a result of the efforts of millions
of immigrants who fled their homelands to seek a better life in our
land. Libertarians believe that all Americans are best served if the
doors to our nation remain free and open.
Many fear that the welfare programs which we have created would
act as a magnet to draw immigrants to America. Some say that being
poor in America offers a higher standard of living than many can
attain in their homelands. We agree. However this is not a good
reason to slam our doors shut on those who seek freedom and an
opportunity to prosper through their own honest efforts. If anything,
the situation calls for the reform or end of these welfare programs.
Others fear that immigrant labor would throw Americans out of
work. In fact, what will happen is that greater competition will
develop for jobs, particularly in the area of unskilled labor. The
principal result of this competition can only be a reduction in labor
costs which will ultimately be passed on to all American consumers in
the form of price reductions on labor-intensive goods and services.
Those who object most strenuously to an "open door" policy are those
labor groups which stand to gain the most from monopolizing the labor
market.
America was once respected around the world as a symbol of peace
and freedom -- the land of opportunity. People voted with their feet.
They left much behind to come to the United States. We should return
to the proud tradition of welcoming all who would join us, wishing
them well, and allowing them to earn their way.
To quickly achieve an open door policy, we endorse the following
immediate steps:
1. Amend all welfare and benefit programs to exclude coverage and
services for anyone who is not a U. S. citizen.
2. Repeal all laws and regulations which require a work permit or
other form of government approval for a foreign citizen to work in the
United States.
3. Eliminate all immigration quotas.
HEALTH CARE AND HEALTH COSTS
Our health is far too important to entrust to politicians and
bureaucrats. Government's ever-expanding role in our nation's health
care system interferes with the ability of patients and doctors to
freely select treatments, denies potentially life-saving medicines to
the terminally ill, encourages fraud in government- funded care and
research, and causes skyrocketing costs for everyone. Quality,
affordable health care is increasingly unavailable.
In the name of insuring that drugs are safe and effective, the
Food and Drug Administration delays or blocks the introduction of new
drugs while patients who could benefit suffer and dis. Victims of
AIDS and other terminally ill patients are routinely denied the
experimental drugs which offer their only hope for life.
Most medical research in the U. S. is funded by government.
Politics, not science, dictates research priorities. The government
grant system fosters fraud and abuse. Honest researchers who "blow
the whistle" on fraud lose their grants while the fraud is covered up.
Meanwhile, important breakthroughs like the discovery of the AIDS
virus are made by small privately- financed institutes operating free
of government bureaucracy.
Increased subsidies for health care, including Medicare and
Medicaid, have inflated costs, promoted fraud, and reduced the
standard of care provided. Government "cost containment" regulations
have failed to contain costs while inflating private hospital bills
and insurance premiums.
The most effective way to battle serious diseases, like AIDS, is
through education and prevention. Yet government regulations restrict
the type of information which can be mailed, broadcast, or taught in
public schools. Government prohibits the sale of sterile needles,
resulting in needless deaths among drug addicts and those they infect.
The Libertarian Party proposes the following steps to insure
access to affordable, quality health care for all Americans:
1. End government restrictions that limit our choice of treatment,
medications, and health care providers.
2. Replace government funded and controlled research with tax credits
for private contributions to medical research.
3. End government medical insurance programs. Pending elimination,
contract medical insurance for the poor with private insurers.
4. Eliminate regulations which restrict our access to medical
information.
-------------end cut -------------
-marc
andersom@spot.colorado.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992May27.070810.28037@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!spot.Colorado.EDU!andersomReferences:
<1992May26.205143.1425@csn.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f49ec,d04e2703621f3a76 X-Google-Attributes: gidf49ec,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-05-26 18:53:48 PST Newsgroups: boulder.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!spot.Colorado.EDU!andersom From: andersom@spot.Colorado.EDU (Marc Anderson) Subject: Libertarian Program Message-ID: <1992May27.070810.28037@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder References: <1992May26.205143.1425@csn.org> Distribution: co Date: Wed, 27 May 1992 07:08:10 GMT Lines: 516