🚀 go-pugleaf

dand@shell.rmii.com (Dan Duncan) writes:

>As I recall, Melissa Rhiannon Brookstone (Melissa@asupernet.com) wrote:
>->Just follow my sig below for the whole story:

>I was most interested in this piece of your web page:
>"In 1989 we found out it was medically necessary for me to undergo whats 
> called male-to-female sex reassignment surgery ( srs ) "

>"Medically necessary?"  

>Regardless of your reason for doing so, your case (if true) is a 
>WONDERFUL example to use to get this law struck down.  One real
>and existing example is far better than half a dozen "but what
>if" cases.  I wish you luck!

Would the law consider them "a woman married to another woman", or
"a woman married to a man who has had a lot of cosmetic surgery"?
For that matter, are M->F transexuals able to qualify as women for
affirmative action purposes?

Spam blocked address; to send   |   When we are planning for posterity, we
me mail, change "at" to "@"     |   ought to remember that virtue is not
and "dot" to "."                |   hereditary.     --Thomas Paine