Re: process group question

Article View: bt.unix

Article #5

From: Steve A Rooke
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1990 13:44

16 lines
1116 bytes

With all this talk about job-control I feel like a poor relation still
working on an AT&T (based) SVR2 :-)

So that's what all those funny kill/ioctl calls do, I thought they were
just something to make BSD look better :-) * :-) <thats a smilley squared

How about a `bt.i.wish.i.had' newsgroup.  It would go down a bundle here.

Just using the bandwidth.

Steve
---
Steve Rooke  steve@gapos.bt.co.uk  (...mcvax!ukc!gapos!steve)  UK + 394 693595
BT, ITS/CS, Area 106, Anzani House,   | "You roll the dice with your heart
Trinity Ave, FELIXSTOWE, Suffolk, UK  |   and soul,  But some times you
#include <std/disclaimer>             |    just don't know." - Sam Brown

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1336@gapprd.gapos.bt.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!gapos!gapos!azh01!steve

References: <1281@sun2.summer.bt.co.uk> <1990Feb9.111849.22479@axion.bt.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!gapos!gapos!azh01!steve
From: steve@gapos.bt.co.uk (Steve A Rooke)
Newsgroups: bt.unix,bt.general,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: process group question
Message-ID: <1336@gapprd.gapos.bt.co.uk>
Date: 9 Feb 90 13:44:00 GMT
References: <1281@sun2.summer.bt.co.uk> <1990Feb9.111849.22479@axion.bt.co.uk>
Sender: news@gapos.bt.co.uk
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message