Article View: bu.localpostings
Article #153Re: to meirman( soc.culture.jewish)
From: tryinghard
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 00:00
54 lines
2838 bytes
2838 bytes
In article <84dldr$v5$1@news1.bu.edu>, simon1@bu.edu (Simcha Streltsov) wrote: > X-Orig-MsgId: <84dldo$q4r$11@news1.bu.edu> > > tryinghard@my-deja.com wrote: > > : How the Conservative clergy are so knowledgable that they can > : differentiate niddah from zavah is beyond my > : comprehension. Which is comical because their entire intruction to all > : of Yoreh Deah boils down to a > : Reader's Digest verison 22 clock-hour low level course in practical > : halacha (CDE 3809x)." > > : Bakcon seems to apply this to Prof. Kraemer, (since he is the only one > : whom Kaiser has claimed as knowledgebale in the laws of Niddah) Yet > : backon has no knowledge whatoever of Kraemer's background, > > thanks for a reasoned list: > > : 1. Kraemer's qulifiactions are not mentioned in it at all > > I assume that an ordinary Rabbi would have to council his > congregants in practical cases. thus, the reference > backons assertion came immediately following Kaiser's pointer to a source, a source which backon did not take up. I therefore assumed that he was disparaging the source (presumably a member of what Mr. bacon calls "the C clergy"), rather than questioning how the position could be applied in practice. the latter would be a legitimate question ( and one that I simply do not have the qualifications to answer at this time) involving how frequently cases like this come up, the mechanism for referral from your average congregational rabbi to more halahkically expert rabbis, etc. It might well lead to conclusion that the position enunciated by Mr. Kaiser, while defensible in theory, is unworkable in practice. However in order to pursue this question one would first have to acknowledge that there ARE halakhically knowledgable C rabbis, a position that Mr. bacon refuses to accept. Mr. Bacon uses every misleading rhetorical device at his disposal to assert his position on this. It is for that reason that I continue to find his posts more misleading than Mr. Kaiser's. shalom tryinghard > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<84ds3k$af2$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<84d8pf$sn7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <84dldr$v5$1@news1.bu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1552e4,9be673507a4754e5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1552e4,public From: tryinghard@my-deja.com Subject: Re: to meirman( soc.culture.jewish) Date: 1999/12/29 Message-ID: <84ds3k$af2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Deja-AN: 566212390 References: <84d8pf$sn7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <84dldr$v5$1@news1.bu.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x40.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 198.151.12.15 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Dec 29 20:58:26 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtryinghard Newsgroups: bu.localpostings X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) via NetCache version NetApp Release 3.2.1: Thu May 21 16:33:01 PDT 1998