🚀 go-pugleaf

X-Orig-MsgId: <8489nj$imu$1@news1.bu.edu>

Gwen A Orel (gaost3+@pitt.edu) wrote:

: I'm not interested in figuring out in what other ways we may consider
: Paul a sinner.  I think the attitudes presented on this list towards
: his question have been defensive and evasive and frankly, you're continuing
: the pattern with this ad hominem claptrap.

OK, I thinnk we agree taht Dr Kail called himself a meat shipper. I
did not see his reply yet, but let's assume for now that he lied
as the most probable option.

as to your reference to a reaction to his first questions - I agree,
and AFAIR, I did not reply with "why are you asking", and I agree that
we should not reply like that - you never know why someone asked something,
and I personally can think about a 100 inappropriate questions that
I may ask about something unfamiliar.

As to your reference to "ethics", I also agree with you. That is exactly
why I asked whether Dr Kail's research is ethical. IMHO, if you feel
it is important enough to spend time informing this guy about the
ethics of animal-slaughter, you may also inform him about ethics
of research that involve people! not only people are more important,
but he is unlikely to consume much of kosher meat in his life, but 
I am sure he'll do more research (probably 
at the expense of the taxpayers)!


 

--
Simcha Streltsov		disclaimer, as requested by Mo-he S-rr
simchastr@juno.com		all punctuation marks in this article
http://cad.bu.edu/go/simon	are equivalent to (-: