Article View: bu.localpostings
Article #477Re: 'crap' prasad vs Mumbai bowlers( rec.sport.cricket)
From: Shantanu Desai
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00
56 lines
2788 bytes
2788 bytes
X-Orig-MsgId: <840kh5$bc3$1@news1.bu.edu> Ravi Krishna <sravik@bellsouth.net> wrote: : <shantanu9847@my-deja.com> :> No other country would have retained Prasad after his horrendous NZ :> tour last year. : You are absolutely right. NO OTHER COUNTRY is the key word, not India. : Remember it is the same india which tolerated Dr. 434 Maharaj for 10 yrs as : a bowler, even though he was worse than Prasad as a bowler. : Test Wkts : Avg 5fer 10fer : Kapil 1984-1994 69 187 32.21 : - : Crap Prasad 27 82 32.23 : 6 1 : Don't givemme crap about Kapil's batting. he was always selected as a : bowler. Want proof. Just check how many times India played with 4 specialist : bowlers other than Kapil. : RK- No I won't give the crap about Kapil's batting. However let me try to explain what might have led selectors to give a free ride to Kapil.Note I am not saying that such a thing is correct. In the West if a prof. joins a university and does excellent research,teaching and mentoring in their early years they are given a tenure,which means they are assured of a permanent job even if they don't do anything rest of their carrer. Kapil's achievemnts before 1984 have been unparalled by anyone else ,viz a World Cup Victory,helping us to square a series abroad,winning test matches against Pakistan. That is why selectors might have decided to give him a "tenure". Note I am not saying this is correct. Maybe I can forgive Kumble's free ride in tests abroad based on his contribution to test wins at home. However for Christ's sake I just can't figure out why a free ride is given to Prasad,Azhar or Crapbhajan who have done absolutely nothing.If nothing else at least theere should be pressure on him to perform. shantanu "Prasad as usual was bowling his normal consistently poutside the off stump and looking totally harmless" Sadiq's description of Prasad's carp bolwing last year against NZ.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<840khb$cvj$1@news1.bu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<83rc3n$6bi$1@jetsam.uits.indiana.edu> <rwb84.5969$Dj6.88842@news2.mia> <83tqja$rhs$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <47y84.10013$Dj6.129343@news2.mia>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1552e4,ca7a06efa0830cb,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1552e4,public
From: Shantanu Desai <shantanu@bu.edu>
Subject: Re: 'crap' prasad vs Mumbai bowlers( rec.sport.cricket)
Date: 1999/12/24
Message-ID: <840khb$cvj$1@news1.bu.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 564619630
References: <83rc3n$6bi$1@jetsam.uits.indiana.edu> <rwb84.5969$Dj6.88842@news2.mia> <83tqja$rhs$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <47y84.10013$Dj6.129343@news2.mia>
Organization: Boston University Physics Department
X-Orig-Newsgrp: rec.sport.cricket
User-Agent: tin/1.4-19991113 ("No Labels") (UNIX) (IRIX64/6.5 (IP27))
Newsgroups: bu.localpostings