🚀 go-pugleaf

*** wrote:
> 
> In article <326169E3.7766@easynet.co.uk>, sdef! <savage@easynet.co.uk>
> writes
> >If we ensure every tree is 'safe' then we are left with a parody of
> >nature, a sanitised theme park where there is never any danger.
> >
> snip
> >I suspect though that their concern is more to do with the legacy of
> >anal victorian tidyness and cleanliness we are still lumbered with, and
> >the 'danger' is that their narrow and self-centered view of the world is
> >threatened by views of wild, untamed, self-sufficient and rampant
> >nature, so they must control it.
> >
> snip
> I was sorry to hear that the NPA decided to fell these trees, but am
> irritated by all this personal abuse directed at people who are just
> doing their jobs.

And I am extremely irritated by the attitude that trees are a commodity. 
The idea that it is only important to conserve species is the mentality 
of the supermarket. These are living thing we are talking about. Life 
does not exist purely for our use. 

In my own life I have had enough of managers.
Andy 
-- 
http://www.hrc.wmin.ac.uk/campaigns/earthfirst.html
South Downs EF!,  Prior House      
6, Tilbury Place, Brighton BN2 2GY,  UK
"Happy is he who dares to defend passionately
that which he loves" -Ovidius