🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4jhbb8$g58@hprcl192.mayfield.hp.com> Mike Schleeter <mschleeter@mayfield.hp.com> writes:
>
>Please read the entire constitution, in particular the part of about life 
>and liberty...

  I have, dood.  That is why I am so mystified at your "truly quaint"
  interpretation of it.   So, if it isn't in the bill of rights as
  you first claimed, WHERE is it?  Could it be you haven't a clue
  and are just trying to BS your way thru?   


  Uh, oh, just checked again.  Sorry, I was wrong.  Way down in 
  paragraph LXIX there IS this little sentence that states that
  "Neither congress nor the individual states shall ever interfere
   with the God-given right of barbaric humans to prove their humanity
   by engaging in senseless slaughter of their fellow creatures."

   Sorry, my apologies.  Go slaughter them suckers.  

>In addition the same laws that currently allow hunting for deer, wild 
>pigs, assorted birds and other animals in the state..

   Doood.  I gotcha now.  If killing ONE type of animal is legal, the
   Constitution guarantees your rights to kill ALL of them.  Much
   thanks, it is SO much clearer now.  Boy, howdy, this here Internet
   is a wonderful way to gits an eddikashun.  

>How many times must it be pointed out that it is wholly natural for a 
>being to use its superior intelligence to accomplish any it chooses.

   So if I get your drift, like, doood, if you and I were to take an
   IQ test and I beat you by say something like 10-20
   points, this would give me the right to unlimber the .264 magnum
   in my closet and "express my natural rights"?    Wow, care to
   meet me at the local Mensa office....this could be FUN!!!!!!!

   Hey, doood.  Like, say what if a buncha Californians, like ya know,
   who had this "superior intelligence" thing going for them..ya know,
   say maybe these folks were to choose to keep the barbarians from
   murdering wild creatures just to prove their manhood, would like
   this be something you could like, ya know, defend as their "natural
   right"?   


>Please try to remember what's posted here from one day to the next.

  We do doood.  See, we're onto you son.  You REALLY are a paid shill
  for the opponents of Prop 197.  A couple of samples of your
  philosophy of life, comments on the constitution, and the "rights"
  of human beings and only those folks who intentionally run over
  puppies would manage to contain their nausea long enough to vote
  for Prop 197.  


>That it is "incidental" does not mean it would not occur; only that the 
>process of hunting includes quite a bit more. Please learn to read. 

   So what ELSE does this "hunting" involve.  Doood, we can't "read"
   it if you don't like explain it to us.  Would this be onna them
   there male-bonding ritual thingies or something?  Would there
   be any BABES involved in this at all?  Would there be any babes
   or hunters who aren't sorta "a bit too close cousins" in on this
   hunting thingie?