🚀 go-pugleaf

Carl H. Starrett II wrote:
>
> Fish and Game could do a lot of things, but they know their jobs better
> than we do and I would rather return to them the full authority they
> used to have to do their job right.

Yes Carl, Fish and Game does know their jobs better than we do.

According to DFG, "recreational hunting, would not be expected to
sufficiently reduce lion densities to result in lowering the
potential for human attacks."  They already have all the authority
they need to do their job *right*.

Here are a few places you might be able to learn about
what is really going on here.

http://www.ns.net/mtnlion/
http://www.sierraclub.org/chapters/ca/mountain-lion/
http://www.envirolink.org/arrs/fund/alerts/states/calion.html

> Besides, we are talking an animal her, not a human being.  Why is it
> that people act as though animals should have the same rights as
> humans?

It's not a matter of the *same* rights.  The question is
should they have *no* rights at all.

VOTE NO ON 197!

-- 
Keith G. Wagner             ----------------------------
mailto:keithw@tidepool.com  
mailto:kgw@axe.humboldt.edu   "Visualize Whirled Peas"        
mailto:kwagner@igc.apc.org
                            ----------------------------
    http://www.tidepool.com/environment/action.htm