Article View: ca.environment
Article #420Re: Cyclists Need No Excuse to Be on the Road
From: John Ciccarelli
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 18:30
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 18:30
55 lines
3543 bytes
3543 bytes
In article <Jym.11Feb1993.0906@naughty-peahen> Jym Dyer <jym@mica.berkeley.edu> writes:
>>>> = jordan@IMSI.COM (Jordan Hayes) writes:
>
>>>> An excellent point. But, even with well-designed bike
>>>> routes, you *still* see lots of ("too damn many") bicycles
>>>> on College Avenue in Berkeley during rush hour for instance.
Hmm. Might it be that there are too damn many cars on the road? ;-)
Why do people who travel only a few miles to work need to bring
2,000 lbs of metal with them? Think about it...
>> = josh@Happy-Man.com (Joshua_Putnam) writes:
>
>> Bike paths and separate bike trails almost always have
>> miserable intersections with ordinary roads, which is one
>> reason bike paths are generally more dangerous than ordinary roads.
>Heretics like myself keep asking how likely it is that a road
>from Point A to Point B is going to have fewer intersections
>than a bike path from Point A to Point B.
Josh did not say *fewer* intersections, just miserable ones.
The problem is this: If a sidepath closely parallels a road, it forms
its own intersection with any cross streets that road intersects.
Traffic motions at this path/street intersection are complex due to
bike traffic entering and exiting the path from the cross street,
linked with bike motions at the main street to cross street intersection.
For example, a cylist heading south on the main street turns left onto
the side street and immediately right into the path entrance.
Also, while from a rules-of-the-road standpoint such a path entrance is
lower-priority than any street (like a driveway), inexperienced cyclists
don't know to yield in such a situation.
>=o= The cover story of the latest (Jan/Feb 1993) _World_Watch_
>gives a *global* perspective on bicycles as a means of trans-
>portation. One point that's brought up is, "when bikes and
>cars are given their own space, the risk of death is 500 times
>greater in cars" (and this doesn't include health problems from
>exhaust, stress, etc.).
With few exceptions, there is simply no way to give bikes their
"own space" in an already built-out urban or suburban area. As a
counterpoint, a British Medical Journal study concluded that the
life expectancy and quality improvements from lifetime cycling
outweigh any added risk by several times. Hmm - "Live longer and
better -- use a bike?"
--
John Ciccarelli Adobe Systems, 1585 Charleston | _~C __C
jciccare@mv.us.adobe.com Mountain View CA USA 94039-7900 | ='\<, ='\<,
uunet!adobe!jciccare 415/962-6677, fax:415/903-0584 | (&)/(\) (&)/(\)
=== "If you live within 7 miles of your job, why drive?" === BIKE TO WORK ==
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Feb11.183022.9555@adobe.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infoserv!decwrl!adobe!jciccareReferences:
<HERMIT.93Jan25020333@am.ucsc.edu> <1993Jan25.210335.28238@Happy-Man.com> <Jym.11Feb1993.0906@naughty-peahen>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,c3088072f07e4274 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ff,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,c3088072f07e4274 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-11 16:04:58 PST Newsgroups: ca.environment,ba.transportation Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infoserv!decwrl!adobe!jciccare From: jciccare@adobe.com (John Ciccarelli) Subject: Re: Cyclists Need No Excuse to Be on the Road Message-ID: <1993Feb11.183022.9555@adobe.com> Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS) Reply-To: jciccare@adobe.com (John Ciccarelli) Organization: Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition (SVBC) References: <HERMIT.93Jan25020333@am.ucsc.edu> <1993Jan25.210335.28238@Happy-Man.com> <Jym.11Feb1993.0906@naughty-peahen> Distribution: ca Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 18:30:22 GMT Lines: 55