Article View: ca.environment
Article #47Re: LETTER: Attention DESERT LOVERS
From: Ecology Center Fund
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 16:13
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 16:13
64 lines
3103 bytes
3103 bytes
/* Written 1:56 pm Aug 11, 1992 by scottt@hpmwtd.sr.hp.com in cdp:ca.environment */ /* ---------- "Re: LETTER: Attention DESERT LOVERS" ---------- */ / hpmwgip4:ca.environment / jym@mica.berkeley.edu (Jym Dyer) / 1:51 pm Aug 6, 1992 / writes: > >The bill is opposed by miners, ranchers and off-roadsters. Seymour, a >Southern California developer, gets much of his campaign funding from >this collection of lobbyists. (The Bureau of Land Management estimates >the desert's potential mineral value at $1 trillion, so you can imagine >the political pressure to rip it open.) Gosh, you don't imagine that his lack of support for S21 is in any way related to the large number of people who showed up at the public input meetings on the bill. The ratio of people against the bill vs supporting it was about 3:1 in the articles I read. >The desert is both the most fragile ecosystem, and the last area lacking >comprehensive environmental protection. (There is no desert analogue >to the California Coastal Commission, for example.) The BLM has a desert management plan which spells out how the desert resources are to be managed. I only wish they would follow the plan they have established instead allowing the complex process of managing the desert to be jerked around by a bunch of armchair environmentalists. I agree that there are sensitive areas of the desert that need special protection, but closing most of the desert and concentrating the public's recreational use to practically nothing is not a reasonable solution. And it's "off-road vehicle enthusiasts" not "off-roadsters". Happy Trails, Scott I like the way you define "public recreation" to exclude the 98 percent of desert enthusiasts who DON'T own one of those fume-spewing, tortoise crushing, phallic replacements you call an off-road vehicle. You know, I would really like to go hiking in the Algodones Dunes someday. Unfortunately, the BLM has seen fit to reserve that area exclusively for "vehicular recreation", effectively EXCLUDING everyone else. Imagine the California Coastal Commission saying "No, we're sorry, this part of the Pacific is reserved for Powerboats: no swimming, diving or surfing allowed." No one would stand for it. Fortunately, ORV areas will, within 75 years, be a thing of the past. People will learn to appreciate the desert for its quiet. And ORV users will die out, probably from exhaustion after trying to hike 200 yards to the road from their disabled machines. Unfortunately, lots of other species will die out at the same time. Chris Clarke
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1332900103@igc.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!sun-barr!ames!sgi!cdp!ecologycntrReferences:
<39990001@hpmwgip4.sr.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!sun-barr!ames!sgi!cdp!ecologycntr From: ecologycntr@igc.org (Ecology Center Fund) Newsgroups: ca.environment Subject: Re: LETTER: Attention DESERT LOVERS Message-ID: <1332900103@igc.org> Date: 12 Aug 92 16:13:00 GMT References: <39990001@hpmwgip4.sr.hp.com> Sender: Notesfile to Usenet Gateway <notes@igc.org> Lines: 64 Nf-ID: #R:hpmwgip4.sr.hp.com:39990001:cdp:1332900103:000:2563 Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!ecologycntr Aug 12 09:13:00 1992