🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.environment
Article #58

Re: Diapers and Baby's

#58
From: Tyler R. Holcomb
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 18:05
42 lines
2574 bytes
frankm@resonex.com (Frank Muennemann) writes:

>In article <37536@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> tcritchl@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Tod Critchlow) writes:
>>                      ... we are trying to make
>>the diaper decision...
>>	From the things I have read
>>it seems like there really isn't any consensus.
>>Although most of the information that is pro-disposable 
>>comes from the diaper companies...

>There IS a consensus: Paper diapers ARE a major component of
>landfill bulk.  If you kid has gastrointestinal infections,
>the microbes wind up being stored in/near the landfill.
>They are NOT environmentally sound.  If you care about the 
>environment, call your local diaper service and ask them for 
>their literature.
Perhaps not a perfectly unbiased source, either.

My understanding is that the answer to the "diaper question" is
"it depends."  In a place like New York, where the water supply
is plentiful (for the time being, anyway) and landfill space is
limited, cloth diapers have a clear advantage.  In drought-ridden
smoggy Los Angelese, the method that consumes considerable
water and appreciable amounts of fossil fuels loses.  

I am sorry I don't have more facts at my fingertips; however, I vaguely
recall this being discussed in Science about 6 months ago.

>The disposable makers say you should remove the liner from the
>plastic cover and flush it so that human waste doesn't enter
>the landfill and spread disease: I've NEVER heard of ANYONE
>doing that!

So other people are lazy -  is that any reason to indict Frank Muennemann?
After all, I know peole who *do* dispose of their childrens disposable
diapers correctly.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tyler Holcomb   *   "Remember, one treats others with courtesy and repsect *
tylerh@juliet   *   not because they are gentlemen or gentlewomen, but     *
  caltech.edu   *   because you are."  - paraphrased from Garth Henrichs   *
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Sep2.180546.25393@cco.caltech.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!tylerh
References: <37536@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> <1992Sep2.075148.9613@resonex.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: ca.environment
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!tylerh
From: tylerh@cco.caltech.edu (Tyler R. Holcomb)
Subject: Re: Diapers and Baby's
Message-ID: <1992Sep2.180546.25393@cco.caltech.edu>
Keywords: the BOTTOM line
Sender: news@cco.caltech.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: sandman
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
References: <37536@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> <1992Sep2.075148.9613@resonex.com>
Distribution: ca
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 18:05:46 GMT
Lines: 42