🚀 go-pugleaf

Helge Weissig wrote:
>> Btw - Mr. Bilbray kept a very low profile in the whole debate.
>>I suspect he is just too afraid to fall between chairs.

>Facts just don't matter to you, do they?  Bilbray was >interviewed a number
>of times on both local and national media.  His position was >clear and
>consistent - Clinton had to honor his promise to come to the >budget table
>with an honest budget.  Bilbray also voted *for* two CRs and a >number of
>spending bills, all of which were *vetoed* by the sociopath in >the White House.

Ahh, Andy-- you of all people should recognize a sociopath when 
you (think) you see one.
Rage on, dude! Esp. since it apprently keeps you from attending 
meetings and
participating in the real work of political activism.

I=92ll skip the rest of your 99K diatribe. Take your meds, Andy, 
and relax.  And at least have
the courtesy to take my name off the title of these threads, 
since you=92ve apparently
changed your scope to another target.

But wait-- what=92s this you say?

>... Rising levels of the Pacific?  From what, the coming Ice Age?

You=92re joking, right? You realize ocean levels decline during 
ice ages since  water is
bound up in the polar ice caps? You claim to have 2 engineering 
degress. Did your science
class skip this basic fact?

>It is true I have a couple of engineering degrees.  It is true that I
>understand that facts and science and numbers matter.  It is true that I
>understand that there was no science behind the ban on CFCs, just a
>ludicriously false campaign of fearmongering about millions of deaths from
>skin cancer and 'ozone holes over Kennebunkport'.  It is true that I
>understand the difference in causes and mortality rates between malignant
>melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma.  It is true
>that I understand the difference between UV-A, UV-B, and UV-C.  It is true
>that I understand what a Dobson unit is.  It is true that I understand that
>there have been NO measurements of increased global UV-B. It is true that I
>know that those who promote fearmongering about ozone depletion are
actively opposed to conducting such measurements.  It is true 
that I... 

<snip>

..know how to take up vast amounts of cyberspace and 
contribute nothing to the conversation...

>The enemy has facts and science. You cant fall into their trap >by using the same language. Its not what moves people to >action."

Apparently you believe that ranting and raving and misspelling 
words will do the trick. 

Hmmm... interesting theory. Doubt it will work. But you just 
keep on trying, Andy. 


Lori Saldana
http://www.netconnection.com/~lsaldana/