🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4cgm3q$cd5@igc.apc.org> tomgray <tomgray@igc.apc.org> writes:
>4c9ku4$n0u@spectator.cris.com> <x7c6wcGUbBKc089yn@gate.net> <4ce6ok$s5e@oolong.memphis.edu> <4cfcqu$cak@spectator.cris.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp4-5.igc.org
>Xref: news.pgh.wec.com sci.energy:40115 sci.environment:76993
>
>grep@cris.com (George B) wrote:
>>
>> Jamie Outlaw <jamie@ce5.gwi.memphis.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> >I have been by the windmill farm in Palm Springs a few times- it was windy 
>> >every time and the scene was magnificent.
>> 
>> As is a cooling tower to a nuclear energy supporter.
>
>Does this mean, then, that your original complaint about the looks
>of the wind plants was simply because you do not support wind?

Cooling towers exist at many thermal stations because of local
thermal "pollution" (the fish love thermal pollution).

However, without a doubt, the most beutiful idustrial complexes
ever built are nuclear power plants. Architecturally, many plants
are quite impressive, and the grounds at most facilities are
very well maintained. As the energy source is clean, and as
ex-naval officers seem to be in charge at most places, "shine
she must" (run if she will).

>Tom Gray

andy.holland@nmd.pgh.wec.com
std. disclaimer