Article View: ca.environment
Article #6312THE EMERGING INTERNATIONAL ORDER
From: mjavid
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 00:00
296 lines
16623 bytes
16623 bytes
Turning Point for All Nations
A Statement of
the Baha'i International Community's
Office of Public Information
on the Occasion of
the 50th Anniversary of the United Nations
"Unification of the whole of mankind is the hall-mark of the stage
which human society is now approaching. Unity of family, of tribe,
of city-state, and nation have been successively attempted and
fully established. World unity is the goal towards which a
harassed humanity is striving. Nation-building has come to an end.
The anarchy inherent in state sovereignty is moving towards a
climax. A world, growing to maturity, must abandon this fetish,
recognize the oneness and wholeness of human relationships, and
establish once for all the machinery that can best incarnate this
fundamental principle of its life."
-Shoghi Effendi, 1936
I. Overview: An Opportunity For Reflection
The 20th Century, one of the most tumultuous periods in human
history, has been marked by numerous upheavals, revolutions and
radical departures from the past. Ranging from the collapse of the
colonial system and the great nineteenth century empires to the
rise and fall of broad and disastrous experiments with
totalitarianism, fascism and communism, some of these upheavals
have been extremely destructive, involving the deaths of millions,
the eradication of old lifestyles and traditions, and the collapse
of time-honored institutions.
Other movements and trends have been more obviously positive.
Scientific discoveries and new social insights have spurred many
progressive social, economic and cultural transformations. The way has
been cleared for new definitions of human rights and affirmations of
personal dignity, expanded opportunities for individual and collective
achievement, and bold new avenues for the advancement of human
knowledge and consciousness.
These twin processes -- the collapse of old institutions on the one
hand and the blossoming of new ways of thinking on the other -- are
evidence of a single trend which has been gaining momentum during the
last hundred years: the trend toward ever-increasing interdependence
and integration of humanity.
This trend is observable in wide-ranging phenomena, from the fusion of
world financial markets, which in turn reflect humanity's reliance on
diverse and interdependent sources of energy, food, raw materials,
technology and knowledge, to the construction of globe-girdling
systems of communications and transportation. It is reflected in the
scientific understanding of the earth's interconnected biosphere,
which has in turn given a new urgency to the need for global
coordination. It is manifest, albeit in a destructive way, in the
capacities of modern weapons systems, which have gradually increased
in power to the point where it is now possible for a handful of men to
bring an end to human civilization itself. It is the universal
consciousness of this trend -- in both its constructive and
destructive expressions -- that lends such poignancy to the familiar
photograph of the earth as a swirling sphere of blue and white against
the infinite blackness of space, an image crystallizing the
realization that we are a single people, rich in diversity, living in
a common homeland.
This trend is reflected, too, in steady efforts by the nations of the
world to forge a world political system that can secure for humanity
the possibility of peace, justice and prosperity. Twice in this
century humanity has attempted to bring about a new international
order. Each attempt sought to address the emergent recognition of
global interdependence, while nevertheless preserving intact a system
which put the sovereignty of the state above all else. In the
perspective of the century now ending, the League of Nations, a
breakthrough in the concept of collective security, marked a first
decisive step toward world order.
The second effort, born from the cataclysm of World War II and based
on a Charter drawn up principally by the victors of that
conflagration, has for fifty years provided an international forum of
last resort, a unique institution standing as a noble symbol for the
collective interests of humanity as a whole.
As an international organization, the United Nations has demonstrated
humanity's capacity for united action in health, agriculture,
education, environmental protection, and the welfare of children. It
has affirmed our collective moral will to build a better future,
evinced in the widespread adoption of international human rights
Covenants. It has revealed the human race's deep-seated compassion,
evidenced by the devotion of financial and human resources to the
assistance of people in distress. And in the all-important realms of
peace-building, peace-making and peace-keeping, the United Nations has
blazed a bold path toward a future without war. [1]
Yet the overall goals set out in the Charter of the United Nations
have proved elusive. Despite the high hopes of its founders, the
establishment of the United Nations some fifty years ago did not usher
in an era of peace and prosperity for all. [2] Although the United
Nations has surely played a role in preventing a third world war, the
last half decade has nevertheless been marked by numerous local,
national and regional conflicts costing millions of lives. No sooner
had improved relations between the superpowers removed the ideological
motivation for such conflicts, than long-smoldering ethnic and
sectarian passions surfaced as a new source of conflagration. In
addition, although the end of the Cold War has reduced the threat of a
global, terminal war, there remain instruments and technologies -- and
to some extent the underlying passions -- which could bring about
planet-wide destruction.
With respect to social issues, likewise, grave problems persist. While
new levels of consensus have been reached on global programs to
promote health, sustainable development and human rights, the
situation on the ground in many areas has deteriorated. The alarming
spread of militant racialism and religious fanaticism, the cancerous
growth of materialism, the epidemic rise of crime and organized
criminality, the widespread increase in mindless violence, the
ever-deepening disparity between rich and poor, the continuing
inequities faced by women, the intergenerational damage caused by the
pervasive break-down of family life, the immoral excesses of unbridled
capitalism and the growth of political corruption -- all speak to this
point. At least a billion live in abject poverty and more than a third
of the world's people are illiterate. [3]
As the twin processes of collapse and renewal carry the world toward
some sort of culmination, the 50th anniversary of the United Nations
offers a timely opportunity to pause and reflect on how humanity may
collectively face its future. Indeed, there has emerged of late a wide
range of useful proposals for strengthening the United Nations and
improving its capacity to coordinate the responses of nations to these
challenges.
These proposals fall roughly into three categories. One group
addresses primarily bureaucratic, administrative and financial
problems within the United Nations system. Another group comprises
those that suggest reconfiguring bodies like the Economic and Social
Council, the Trusteeship Council and the Bretton Woods economic
institutions. Still others propose to undertake changes in the United
Nations political structure, calling, for example, for an expansion of
the Security Council and/or a reconsideration of the United Nations
Charter itself. [4]
Most of these works are constructive; some are also provocative. Among
them, one of the most balanced and thoughtful is the report of the
Commission on Global Governance, entitled, Our Global Neighborhood,
which argues for the widespread adoption of new values, as well as
structural reforms in the United Nations system. [5]
It is in the spirit of contributing to the ongoing discussion and
consultation on this issue of paramount importance that the Baha'i
International Community has been moved to share its views. Our
perspective is based on three initial propositions. First, discussions
about the future of the United Nations need to take place within the
broad context of the evolution of the international order and its
direction. The United Nations has co-evolved with other great
institutions of the late twentieth century. It is in the aggregate
that these institutions will define -- and themselves be shaped by --
the evolution of the international order. Therefore, the mission,
role, operating principles and even activities of the United Nations
should be examined only in the light of how they fit within the
broader objective of the international order.
Second, since the body of humankind is one and indivisible, each
member of the human race is born into the world as a trust of the
whole. This relationship between the individual and the collective
constitutes the moral foundation of most of the human rights which the
instruments of the United Nations are attempting to define. It also
serves to define an overriding purpose for the international order in
establishing and preserving the rights of the individual.
Third, the discussions about the future of the international order
must involve and excite the generality of humankind. This discussion
is so important that it cannot be confined to leaders -- be they in
government, business, the academic community, religion, or
organizations of civil society. On the contrary, this conversation
must engage women and men at the grassroots level. Broad participation
will make the process self-reinforcing by raising awareness of world
citizenship and increase support for an expanded international order.
[....]
-------------------------------Endnotes-------------------------------
1. Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. 1992. An Agenda for Peace: Peace-making
and Peace-Keeping. (Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the
Statement Adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council,
January 31, New York: United Nations.)
2. Surely the preamble to The Charter of the United Nations is among
the most inspired passages in the history of human governance:
"WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED
"to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice
in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and
"to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and
worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of
nations large and small, and
"to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the
obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international
law can be maintained, and
"to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger
freedom,
"AND FOR THESE ENDS
"to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as
good neighbors, and
"to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security,
and
"to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institutions of
methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common
interest, and
"to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic
and social advancement of all peoples,
"HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS.
"Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives
assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full
powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present
Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international
organization to be known as the United Nations."
United Nations. 1994. Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the
International Court of Justice. United Nations Department of Public
Information. DPI/511 - 93243 - April 1994 - 40M.
3. The World Bank. 1994. World Development Report.
(Oxford: Oxford University Press.) pp. 162 - 163.
4. There have been a number of recent proposals which discuss the
need for reforms in the United Nations system within a particular
issue area. Our Common Future, the report of The World Commission on
Environment and Development, for example, suggested a number of
changes, such as the creation of a special UN "Board for Sustainable
Development" to coordinate UN action in promoting development while
protecting the environment.
The World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common
Future. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.)
Likewise, the report of The Brandt Commission, Common Crisis
North-South: Co-operation for World Recovery, makes suggestions for
reform in the critical area of finance, trade and energy, as they
affect North-South imbalances.
The Brandt Commission, Common Crisis North-South: Co-operation for
World Recovery. (London: Pan Books, 1983.)
The literature proposing widespread changes in the United Nations is
also voluminous and continues to grow, especially in anticipation of
the 50th anniversary of the United Nations. The first major and
serious reassessments of the United Nations began in the 1950s, in
anticipation of the 10th anniversary of the Charter. In this regard
the publication in 1958 of World Peace Through World Law by Louis B.
Sohn and Grenville Clark, which was among the first solid proposals to
suggest eliminating the veto power, must be considered a milestone.
Grenville Clark, and Louis B. Sohn, World Peace Through World Law.
(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966.)
More recent proposals range from The Stockholm Initiative, which
offers a generalist vision of what might be done to strengthen the
United Nations, to Harold Stassen's recent United Nations: a Working
Paper for Restructuring, which gives an article-by-article proposal
for rewriting the UN Charter. Benjamin Ferencz's latest book, New
Legal Foundations for Global Survival, offers a series of hard-headed
and legal-minded suggestions for reform based on the premise that
nations, peoples and individuals must be free to pursue their
destinies in whatever way they may see fit - providing it does not
jeopardize or destroy the fundamental human rights of others to live
in peace and dignity.
The Stockholm Initiative on Global Security and Governance 1991.
Common Responsibility in the 1990's.
(Stockholm: Prime Minister's Office, Stockholm, Sweden.)
Harold Stassen, United Nations: A Working Paper for Restructuring.
(Minneapolis: Learner Publications Company, 1994.)
Benjamin Ferencz, New Legal Foundations for Global Survival.
(Oceana Publications, 1994)
5. The Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood.
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.)
[....]
--
extracted by:
*****************************************************************
Mesbah Javid * One planet, one people please!
mjavid@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca * Baha'i Faith unites the world
*****************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4adv0q$nju@news.sas.ab.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,2d5b07261df3a54a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: mjavid@fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca () Subject: THE EMERGING INTERNATIONAL ORDER Date: 1995/12/10 Message-ID: <4adv0q$nju@news.sas.ab.ca> X-Deja-AN: 121359243 organization: Edmonton Freenet, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada newsgroups: ca.environment