Article View: ca.environment
Article #6414Our world
From: jburke
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 1995 00:00
41 lines
2747 bytes
2747 bytes
Hello. I'm new here. I'll be graduating soon and so I'm wasting my time not studying or accumulating any life experience that will broaden my social, political, business, environmental, human perspectives on life... The world we live in is not the best it could be. I don't think anyone will argue with that. So what do we do? Blame, blame, blame. The same environment-saving people that claim that, essentially, any business is bad and that the environment we share should be left pristine, are people who drive cars, wear cotton, use plastics, and share in any number of human needs and wants that would not be available without someone going out and changing the environment to better suit mankind. Sure, we could all save the forests and never cut down a tree...but then have no paper, houses, and many other things. Then there are people who are a part of the business side who claim that the "eco-fanatics" are infringing on their rights to do business. While this is true to some extent, and anyone should have the right to do business in any way he sees fit, it is also true that in the past, gaining wealth was more important than solving problems and that led to the disputes we have today. What we seem to have (at the two extremes) are 1) businesses who are faced with the choices of reducing the stress on the environment with little or no gain to themselves other than the "feel-good" factor or continuing on in the old business pathways of providing some profit-generating product at the expense of the environment, and 2) the pro-environment side who feel that any effect that people have on the environment is bad,bad,bad. People are PART of the environment. They will inherently act to change it just as any other life will and just as the wind that blows will. The key is finding some balance between the inherent effect and the excessive damage that can and has been done around the world. Not only that, but the effort to find the solution MUST be global, for the earth is, well...global. If legislation is enacted in the U.S. to reduce the environmental effect of business, then business WILL go elsewhere. In addition, the resources that are remaining in this country are limited to the extent that it would take very little pushing to make utilizing them that much more unattractive. Whew...flame on. Jason
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jburke-0711951214240001@dmf-6a.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,c353b4b1cba69299,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jburke@ocf.berkeley.edu Subject: Our world Date: 1995/11/07 Message-ID: <jburke-0711951214240001@dmf-6a.berkeley.edu> X-Deja-AN: 118851323 organization: University of California, Berkeley newsgroups: ca.environment