🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3viqci$2ng@gap.cco.caltech.edu> jlodman@alumni.caltech.edu writes:
    >You were arguing that there was no way to determine a market
    >rate for government grazing land, but there is a way to
    >determine the lower bound whether you accept it or not. The
    >state is not setting the price for any land but its own.

No, I argue no such thing. There is no market for grazing lands, unless you
wish to use the ex-USSR concept of "market". Indeed, as we speak, the State
is trying to further prevent a market from ever devloping.

    >I've had about enough of your nonsense Phil. If you can't
    >stick to a topic, than talk to yourself. (And I used to think
    >this guy made sense once in a while - what a maroon!)

Tsk tsk -- still can't refute it, eh? Run away, run away.

Tell me again how there is market when almost all other potential bidders
can not bid a price?

This oughta' be good ...


-- 
"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, and you can't prove it!" - B. Simpson

These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)