🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <mcaldon-2607952141490001@port23.wavenet.com> mcaldon@wavenet.com (Don McKenzie) writes:
    >In article <philDBsopI.GnE@netcom.com>, phil@netcom.com (Phil
    >Ronzone) wrote:
    >
    >>So let me get this straight -- the farmer PAYS the Federal
    >>Government to use the land, and THAT's welfare?
    >>
    >>Pray tell, are there people that want to use this same land
    >>and that are willing to pay more?
    >>
    >>Hmmmmm?
    >>
    >>If not, you use of "welfare" is moronic ....
    >>
    >It's welfare, otherwise known as subsidizing, if the rancher
    >pays less than the market rate. This is the problem. BLM was
    >trying to get a fair price (same as is charged by commercial
    >renters) for the riparian and other damage done. BTW, until I
    >fix my newswatcher I won't be able to read posted replies.
    >Which may be a blessing:-)

Uh, listen slowly. Sorry, I don't have words of less than one syllable.

There is no market rate without a market.

OK? Think about it, repeat it, and see the light.


-- 
"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, and you can't prove it!" - B. Simpson

These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)