🚀 go-pugleaf

 In article <philDCKFzA.KzH@netcom.com>, Phil Ronzone <phil@netcom.com> wrote:
>I'd suggest you take a course in micro-economics. Since the State controls
>(sets) the initial (non-market) price, and in some states, controls who
>can use the land and how, there is no market.

>Whener the State intervenes and "sets" a "price" for a good or service,
>the market goes away.

Fine, change the subject to suit yourself when you're wrong, Phil.
The fact is, nobody with a course in economics would agree with
you. There is a market, a distorted market AS I'VE ALREADY STATED
but a market for private rental grazing property nonetheless by every
accepted definition of the word. It isn't controlled by the state -
it's depressed by the state in some areas.

You were arguing that there was no way to determine a market rate
for government grazing land, but there is a way to determine the lower
bound whether you accept it or not. The state is not setting the price 
for any land but its own.

I've had about enough of your nonsense Phil. If you can't stick to
a topic, than talk to yourself. (And I used to think this guy made
sense once in a while - what a maroon!)