🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <hsdgDBrsBH.9n1@netcom.com> hsdg@netcom.com (Bob Lange) writes:
>Phil Ronzone (phil@netcom.com) wrote:
    >Many people find a signficant difference between domestic
    >animals and wild animals. Also, there are pristine areas, for
    >example in the Sierras, but these are almost always areas
    >under private protection. Finally, I don't recall reading
    >that our tax dollars were used to subsidize 'huge herds of
    >bison.'

Did you have a point to make? If so, please make it.

Oh, and some people find "significant difference" between white people and
black people. So?

    >There has to be a compromise over what is protected and what
    >is not, IMHO. But we do not have to provide welfare subsidies
    >to those who are using public lands for grazing. This
    >distorts the market and represents only a response to
    >politics.

So let me get this straight -- the farmer PAYS the Federal Government to
use the land, and THAT's welfare?

Pray tell, are there people that want to use this same land and that are
willing to pay more?

Hmmmmm?

If not, you use of "welfare" is moronic ....


-- 
"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, and you can't prove it!" - B. Simpson

These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)