🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3umh2e$rht@hpcvca.cv.hp.com> scott@hpcvcem.cv.hp.com (Scott Linn) writes:

>pjc@aloha.net (Patrick J. Chicas) writes:
>: 
>: Be honest Scott, your goals are based on emotion, aren't they?

>ANY goals are based on emotion.  

Nope.. Goals can be based on Logic. 

>Your question does not make any sense in
>this discussion as it stands.

Oh really.. 

>Right...  And because I support laws which say I cannot pollute your water,
>I'm being arrogant by thinking my emotions are good for all.  How silly of
>me!

Your getting emotional.. Let's be logical.. We are not talking about laws. We 
are talking about the CDPA that is very difficult to fund in it's present 
state.

>: I strongly urge you to push the fat cat enviro groups into coughing up some 
>: money to buy your own corner of the Mojave for "Everlasting Protection" from 
>: the baaaad humans. 

>"Fat cat enviro groups"??  Why, Pat, that IS an emotional response.  Looks
>like your attitudes are purely based on emotions.

Weak..  

Back to the question.. Do you think the enviro groups should fund management 
of their projects and/or outright purchase the lands they wish to protect?

>: Honestly, if they/you do buy up a piece, I'll gladly fly over and help 
>: ya lay the fence. 

>Already have.  When are you arriving?

Email me and I'll tell ya where to send the tickets.. :-)   Honestly, I 
support such a theory and will throw my own $$$ contributions at the enviro 
group that steps out of the present  "environmental welfare system" to do the 
right thing.

Pat