🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.environment
Article #6884

Re: Lead battery study debunked

#6884
From: NickJed
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00
14 lines
1138 bytes
Interesting points, John.  I for one, would like to see oil drilling
reduced as demand is lessened by replacement fuels and reduction of fuel
consumption. And I think that reducing drilling would proportionally
reduce natural gas production. 

Overall, I envision a reduction in the greenhouse effect. And that
requires avoiding burning things, *any things*, for energy. Re-using
energy that falls on the earth in solar form, or perhaps from gravity
(hydro-electric) seems attractive. 

Yea, lead batteries are not a great solution, but the lead is at least
recyclable.

I look forward to more info, and prefer to be copied via E-Mail.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3st9hc$qkh@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,98e1ffc79d0d1a42
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
From: nickjed@aol.com (NickJed)
Subject: Re: Lead battery study debunked
Date: 1995/06/29
Message-ID: <3st9hc$qkh@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
X-Deja-AN: 105310421
sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
references: <3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
reply-to: nickjed@aol.com (NickJed)
newsgroups: ca.environment