Article View: ca.environment
Article #6884Re: Lead battery study debunked
From: NickJed
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00
14 lines
1138 bytes
1138 bytes
Interesting points, John. I for one, would like to see oil drilling reduced as demand is lessened by replacement fuels and reduction of fuel consumption. And I think that reducing drilling would proportionally reduce natural gas production. Overall, I envision a reduction in the greenhouse effect. And that requires avoiding burning things, *any things*, for energy. Re-using energy that falls on the earth in solar form, or perhaps from gravity (hydro-electric) seems attractive. Yea, lead batteries are not a great solution, but the lead is at least recyclable. I look forward to more info, and prefer to be copied via E-Mail.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3st9hc$qkh@newsbf02.news.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,98e1ffc79d0d1a42 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: nickjed@aol.com (NickJed) Subject: Re: Lead battery study debunked Date: 1995/06/29 Message-ID: <3st9hc$qkh@newsbf02.news.aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 105310421 sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com references: <3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com> organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) reply-to: nickjed@aol.com (NickJed) newsgroups: ca.environment