Re: Lead battery study debunked

Article View: ca.environment

Article #6912

#6912

From: Wayne Scharf
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 1995 00:00

24 lines
1534 bytes

In article <3st9hc$qkh@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, NickJed <nickjed@aol.com> wrote:
>Interesting points, John.  I for one, would like to see oil drilling
>reduced as demand is lessened by replacement fuels and reduction of fuel
>consumption. And I think that reducing drilling would proportionally
>reduce natural gas production. 
>
>Overall, I envision a reduction in the greenhouse effect. And that
>requires avoiding burning things, *any things*, for energy. Re-using
>energy that falls on the earth in solar form, or perhaps from gravity
>(hydro-electric) seems attractive. 
>
>Yea, lead batteries are not a great solution, but the lead is at least
>recyclable.
>
>I look forward to more info, and prefer to be copied via E-Mail.


Population continues to increase, so combustion will INEVITABLY increase.
...And recycling lead is no eco-picnic...you have lead sulfate for the 
ground water, sulfer & sulfuric acid for the atmosphere, and lead dust 
for you lungs...
-- 
NATRON@KAIWAN.COM
Silverado

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3theol$di6@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3st9hc$qkh@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,98e1ffc79d0d1a42
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
From: natron@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com (Wayne Scharf)
Subject: Re: Lead battery study debunked
Date: 1995/07/06
Message-ID: <3theol$di6@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>
X-Deja-AN: 105760979
references: <3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3st9hc$qkh@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
organization: KAIWAN Internet (310-527-4279,818-756-0180,909-785-9712,714-638-4133,805-294-9338)
newsgroups: ca.environment

Reply to Parent Message