🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3tgvui$ki4@news.cuny.edu> Coyote <tom_bregman@qc.edu> writes:
>phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) wrote:
    >You're the FASCIST, I'm the ANARCHIST. No wait a second I
    >mean you're the STALINIST and I'm the CAPITALIST. What I mean
    >is you're the f**king LIBERTARIAN, RETRO-RACIST,
    >PURITANNICAL, PANTY WEARING, BALD HEADED, WEASEL FACED,
    >PENSISLESS, GEEK and I'm the NEO-LUDDITE.
    >
    >Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah! Take that Phil old boy!

We thank you for yet another shining example of "thought" from the
PC/eco-fascist/liberal/socialist/communist/you-pick-'em world.

It is always a comforting thought to see the non-thought of those that
oppose the concept of freedom for all.

Too bad you do not accept the moral premise that all intercourse among
people should be adult, mutual, and non-coercive.

Tell us, just what excuse do *you* use to "justify" initiation of coercion
against your fellow man?

Thugs like you never have any answer, do they ....

And for the record, that's "running dog capitalist middle roader imperialist
air pirate to you".

That's a serious statement -- the more the good guys were right in point
against the communists, the more names they were called.

As you can see by your post.
-- 
"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, and you can't prove it!" - B. Simpson

These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)