Article View: ca.environment
Article #6948Re: Lead battery study debunked
From: JConlan
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 00:00
26 lines
1598 bytes
1598 bytes
Mr. Benson: I find the electric car issue to be fascinating because it places "pro-environment" types in the awkward position of defending the widespread use of a highly toxic material (at least over short term) and advocating the perpetuation and growth of the centralized electrical power generation industry. How will we avoid the need to mine for more lead if we are to convert a large percentage of our automobile fleet to lead-acid battery powered electric motors? By recycling the 20 pound battery in the gasoline powered car that each electric car with its multi-hundred pound battery pack displaces? You don't even touch on the issue of the inefficiency of converting fossil fuel to electrical power. Why do we even want electric cars? Compressed natural gas cars perform as well as gasoline autos with existing technology, consume less energy per mile driven than electric cars ever will and emit about the same quantities of priority pollutants as similar electric vehicles when the full energy conversion cycle is taken into account. Your thoughts? John Conlan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<APC&1'0'4f727188'763@igc.apc.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,98e1ffc79d0d1a42 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jconlan@aol.com (JConlan) Subject: Re: Lead battery study debunked Date: 1995/06/22 Message-ID: <3sc016$aj0@newsbf02.news.aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 104936386 sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com references: <APC&1'0'4f727188'763@igc.apc.org> organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) reply-to: jconlan@aol.com (JConlan) newsgroups: ca.environment